Darkenblot
Penix Power!
- Joined
- Apr 21, 2020
- Messages
- 18,459
- Reaction score
- 19,441
Carson took them a game from it. You don't get extra points for playing well for shitty franchises for a short period of time. Again, I love Kurt Warner, but his career is four good years (the other one was shortened by injury).
Votes absolutely give extra points to guys for playing well with historically awful franchises. The whole Cardinals storyline was about rising from the pits of despair with Warner and Fitz.
That is one more good year than Snake had and no one here would say Stabler wasn't a valid Hall of Famer. Because he was.
I do understand what you are saying. The PFR's similar player formula labels Warner's career as most similar to Gannon, Jeff Garcia, Cunningham, Trent Green, One Legged Theismann, Culpepper, Namath, Steve Grogan, Michael Vick, and White.
Namath is the only Hall of Famer in the group and his candidacy is certainly debatable. But the HOF is more than performance. It is about story and lore. Warner's tale is a movie storyline. It became a movie. And he won a ring.
Does Warner make it without a ring? No. But neither does Snake or Namath and probably a few other guys. The Mad Bomber makes it if we beat GB in SB II.