Bunyan
Huge Member
- Joined
- Nov 4, 2010
- Messages
- 7,955
- Reaction score
- 6,147
Yeah. I told 007 in the WR thread that he reminds me of Darrin Waller.I think he's a move TE once he adds on another 15 or so pounds
Yeah. I told 007 in the WR thread that he reminds me of Darrin Waller.I think he's a move TE once he adds on another 15 or so pounds
I think with these type or guys the line between WR and TE is minimal. A "move" TE is nothing more than a big pass catcher with a limited role as a blocker on or near LOS, but still more than what a WR gives you.Yeah. I told 007 in the WR thread that he reminds me of Darrin Waller.
Waller’s blocking ability surprised.I think with these type or guys the line between WR and TE is minimal. A "move" TE is nothing more than a big pass catcher with a limited role as a blocker on or near LOS, but still more than what a WR gives you.
Waller’s blocking ability surprised.
You saying he’s Seth Roberts?Waller is more WR than TE.
You saying he’s Seth Roberts?
Never seen him block.Mike Evans.
Never seen him block.
Seemed like he lined up as a TE the majority of the time though. I'd like to see the numbers on that.Waller is more WR than TE.
Seemed like he lined up as a TE the majority of the time though. I'd like to see the numbers on that.
Waller was targeted because Williams was injured and Renfrow was our only other good option.He lined up all over the place but that’s not necessarily my point. I can’t find routes run numbers but he was targeted on par with a WR which means he was running routes more than he was blocking. I probably should have said *receiver* instead of WR, although he lined up outside plenty.
Waller was targeted because Williams was injured and Renfrow was our only other good option.
If anything I think his injury slowed Waller down.Thats not true... Ridiculous statement actually
Seemed like he lined up as a TE the majority of the time though. I'd like to see the numbers on that.