I’m being childish? You’re the one who likened me to a cult worshiper.
And it’s been more than a dozen references, my good sir, to FO, QBR, QB Rating, PFF and QB Index. I quote them all. They are useful. FO is particularly useful b/c it has comprehensive and per drive stats.
You also
know my opinion. Don’t act like you don’t. That’s not honest. What is it today? Something in the water that’s causing people to make you shit on this board?
Tell me, if I disagree with you about something, how should I go about addressing our disagreement? Where is the fun or substance in just saying, “Your wrong” or “Your wrong, why, because I said so!” I suppose I could go all Posty on you, but nobody wants that. Do a NIPS? Already covered.
I’ll stay in my lane. I enjoy
rebutting opinions with
published materials. It’s what I do for a living. You can throw a tantrum and try to belittled Kacsmar’s work, but, regardless, it forces you to deal with facts.
To me, it is
less persuasive to disagree with someone who thinks Carr is a below average QB by responding with, no, he’s tier 3! That’s not a big difference. So I go with published data that ranks Carr in the top 10, b/c that is more difficult to reconcile with the opinion with which I disagree. Hope that makes sense.
For example, Dak had a good year throwing the football. Does that make him the “best” QB in the NFL? Only
you said that, no body else. What it does do is make clear that Dak is
not a “below average” QB. The same rationale applies to Carr (IMO).
I’m spelling this out to avoid being slandered by you again. If you do truly enjoy having these discussions, be honest about them please.