Welcome to the team: new, now old GM Tom Telesco, who has been fired

Status
Not open for further replies.
Why would a team in need of a franchise qb willingly trade out of their spot to draft one? If you were the owner/gm would you trade out of that spot? I would've called 31 other gms the second I secured the 2 overall and told them to get fucked. I'm willing to bet that's exactly what happened. I have no idea why people keep bashing Telesco for not trading with Washington. After the top 3, you can argue about but none of top 3 teams were moving
 
alteredst8 said:
We as Raider fans have plenty to be pissed off about without some Fabracadabra that we could have traded up and or “should have” called about a trade that everyone knew wasn’t happening.
Click to expand...
this is great use of the word though it shouldn’t be capitalized but you can add the trademark indicator 😂
 
RF34 said:
Because the NFL is just like Madden in Franchise mode, duh.... :confused:
Click to expand...
Daughter Reaction GIF
 
SSH401 said:
Why would a team in need of a franchise qb willingly trade out of their spot to draft one? If you were the owner/gm would you trade out of that spot? I would've called 31 other gms the second I secured the 2 overall and told them to get fucked. I'm willing to bet that's exactly what happened. I have no idea why people keep bashing Telesco for not trading with Washington. After the top 3, you can argue about but none of top 3 teams were moving
Click to expand...
chicago did it and wound up with williams instead of bryce young. both years the second qb picked was much better. but if you're team has tons of holes getting multiple picks can make sense.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1D4
cruedi said:
chicago did it and wound up with williams instead of bryce young. both years the second qb picked was much better. but if you're team has tons of holes getting multiple picks can make sense.
Click to expand...
Yes it happens all the time if a team has a top 7 pick they very often have a QB issue. If the Giants had the first pick they would be trading down even though they have had a QB issue for about 8 years. The Browns once tanked for two years for a player and chickened out and traded the pick at the last minute. If teams want a QB ranked late first round they can trade down for more future picks and hope to still get their guy. The Sanders camp is basically suggesting teams to do it this year.
 
DonkeyKilla said:
this is great use of the word though it shouldn’t be capitalized but you can add the trademark indicator 😂
Click to expand...
I’m working on my kids replacing CAP with it in certain situations. Not all the details have been worked out but… It’s a tough one to navigate because if used incorrectly or with the wrong tone you sound.

Gay Lgbt GIF by giphystudios2021
 
SSH401 said:
Why would a team in need of a franchise qb willingly trade out of their spot to draft one? If you were the owner/gm would you trade out of that spot? I would've called 31 other gms the second I secured the 2 overall and told them to get fucked. I'm willing to bet that's exactly what happened. I have no idea why people keep bashing Telesco for not trading with Washington. After the top 3, you can argue about but none of top 3 teams were moving
Click to expand...
The only was trading like 3 First to AZ or the Titans for a shot at Pennix or even jump in front of Denver for Bo… if you pull the posts, about half the board would be against that price…anyway Fuck You Minshew, Getchy and AP. Those 3 made things worse this years expectations.
 
cruedi said:
chicago did it and wound up with williams instead of bryce young. both years the second qb picked was much better. but if you're team has tons of holes getting multiple picks can make sense.
Click to expand...
Chicago still had Fields who they were trying to make it work with
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top