Week 8 Preview – Raiders v Pittsburgh

Rupert

The Long Wind
Joined
Nov 2, 2005
Messages
10,109
Reaction score
3,428
Week 8 Preview – Raiders v Pittsburgh
October 23, 2003
By Rupert Pollard

The Raiders are coming off their first victory of the season. And while it couldn’t be called a thing of beauty, it was a success where previously winnable games were defeats. Pittsburgh is coming off a frustrating overtime loss. In the process they lost their starting QB to a concussion. How long he remains out has not yet been determined. How will Sunday’s game shake out?

Offense

Pittsburgh’s defense is below average against the pass, and they proved it by allowing the league’s worst (yes, it’s true) passing attack to pass to win. Since Pittsburgh has a slightly above average number of sacks, I was surprised that they generated essentially no pass rush against Atlanta. The odd thing was that even though the steel curtain is good against the run, they gave up 173 yards to the best rushing attack in the league, below Atlanta’s gaudy 222 per game, but still, 173 yards on the ground. The Steelers played Polamalu up near the line for most of the game to counter Atlanta’s rushing attack, and that left the rest of their secondary vulnerable. The Falcons used pulling linemen with relative impunity against Pittsburgh’s front three and were able to gain favorable position on the front seven with their zone attack, which is probably the second most synchronized next to Denver’s. I think Atlanta’s advantage over Denver is their frequent trap blocking and pulling.

Okay, so how should the Raiders attack Pittsburgh? I think the Raiders will get a little break in pass protection this week, but with their tendency to get confused against stunts and blitzes, I expect the Steelers to bring them in obvious pass situations. To that end, the Raiders should try to stay out of them, which will be a good trick, since they haven’t until late against Arizona. Pittsburgh has speed around the corners and gave up yards on the ground when Atlanta came at them between the tackles. If the Raiders stick with Crockett up the middle, they should do pretty well. They will need to get the run established if they are going to use play action to keep Pittsburgh honest.

The Raiders will need to be a little more cautious in the air. Even though Pittsburgh gives up the yards, they are tied for the league lead in interceptions. Except for three by Polamalu, they have one from eight other players, which means they’re good at dropping people into the path of the ball. And even though they don’t have shut-down corners, I would expect them to be able to concentrate on our receivers and let the backers take away Anderson. Polamalu will definitely be spying routes and tendencies we’ve exhibited in the passing game. I wouldn’t be surprised to see him playing a role similar to the one Harrison played against Moss last year at New England.

What should the Raiders do? Simple, run out the same game plan they used against Arizona and Cleveland. Pittsburgh has difficulty with the pass, and can be taken away from the run to stop the pass. Three wide receiver sets have proven to give us the most effective route combinations and Walter the best options for completions. Finally, we’ve had the most success with it. I don’t know that I’d come out with play action, but I’d mix it in more before the half to try to establish a lead.

Defense

Pittsburgh’s average rushing attack was absolutely bottled up by Atlanta’s front four. It was remarkably similar to how Arizona was disrupted the past two weeks. The Steelers’ offensive line runs a very similar scheme to Arizona and Atlanta with a mix of zone blocking and traps and pulls. Atlanta was able to knife through and disrupt the play before it got started. Pittsburgh’s above average passing game torched the Falcons’ porous secondary. Atlanta only has an average number of sacks, but was able to find success in Pittsburgh’s backfield in spite of poor coverage.

This will be a battle of the Raiders’ league-leading pass defense against Pittsburgh’s above average pass offense. Hines Ward will be a tough matchup for the Raiders secondary, but I think Fabian Washington is up to the task. In fact, I think the Raiders top four corners match up well against the Steelers’ top four receivers. If the Steelers find enough success in the running game to force the Raiders to use zone coverage frequently, they will torch us like they torched Atlanta’s zone coverage.

The Steelers were absolutely embarrassed trying to run the ball against Atlanta. It was very similar to how Oakland shut down Edgerrin James. The difference is that Atlanta was known for that prior to the game. Can the Raiders do to Pittsburgh what Atlanta did? It’s possible, but there’s a difference between shutting down a struggling rushing game and shutting down a fairly confident one. Did their performance against Atlanta shake Pittsburgh’s confidence? Maybe. But if it did, expect them to try to re-establish it against Oakland. If the Raiders want to gain confidence, they simply need to see that Atlanta did to Pittsburgh what they did to Arizona. The talent might be better in Pittsburgh, but they can be attacked the same way.

Surprisingly, I think the Raiders should come at Pittsburgh the same way they came at Arizona. Whether they face Batch or Roethlisberger, they won’t be facing a rookie. Roethlisberger has shown a tendency to get rattled this season after being fearless prior to his accident and abdominal surgery, but he was coming out of it before going down against Atlanta. The bells might still be ringing if he gets under center this week.

Special Teams

Neither Jeff Reed nor Chris Gardocki impress me much as kicking specialists. Santonio Homes is a dangerous kick returner, but he’s shown a tendency to cough the ball up as a punt returner. Both Janikowski and Lechler are solid in the kicking game and Oakland’s kick coverage was very good against Arizona after having lapses the past few weeks. If there’s an advantage here, Oakland has it.

Bottom Line

Atlanta’s defense is a run stopper but is below average overall in the league. Still, Pittsburgh put up huge passing numbers against them. The Raiders’ defense took advantage of a weak offense to bolster their very good overall numbers on defense. However, Oakland’s low-ranked rush defense will need to come up big to keep Pittsburgh’s rushing attack in neutral.

The last time the Raiders faced a relatively balanced offense, they gave up 27 points (7 of San Fran's points came on defense). Assuming a similar output from the Steelers, the question becomes whether the Raiders can put up 28 points. The main reason the Raiders haven’t put up more than 22 points this season has been turnovers. The Raiders have given the ball away 20 times this season. If they’re going to win this game, they need to change that tune.

I want to call this game for the Raiders. I really do. But for me to go there, I’d have to believe they can cut down the turnovers. I’d also have to believe they can put the clamps on the Steelers’ offense. Okay, I’ll go against logic and guess the Raiders score more than they have so far this season. Raiders win 24 – 20.
 
I'll be realistic and predict a loss in a low scoring game.
 
The Falcons used pulling linemen with relative impunity against Pittsburgh’s front three and were able to gain favorable position on the front seven with their zone attack, which is probably the second most synchronized next to Denver’s. I think Atlanta’s advantage over Denver is their frequent trap blocking and pulling.

Isn't it the same guy doing the O-line coaching? I could have sworn. Also, why they both have the same penchant for marginally-legal blocking technique.
 
Alex Gibbs is now a consultant for Atlanta. The difference is that Atlanta and Pittsburgh use more traps than I remember Denver using. Denver relies more heavily on the outside zone and a cutback read.

Since there's less reliance on the outside zone, there's less use of the backside cut block.
 
No, nice try. Good one though. It's a little more subtle.
 
Need a reason to hate the Steelers at this point?

Here you go -- The Immaculate Reception --- fuckers.

Damn Horace Jones need to run through that guy on his way to dummy. Damn.
 
Actually, I didn't use the original wording at the end. I thought I had used, "The Raiders will score far more than anytime this season." Yeah, 2 points, woo hoo!
 
Rupert said:
Roethlisberger is going to be listed as questionable by the Steelers for Sunday's game. The MRI was negative and they were encouraged by the results of the concussion test.

Who else wants to make their prediction for Sunday's game?


Our ST right now and we are playing pretty good, Carr is just inches away from breaking one off huge.
It is possible that Ben, Casey Hampton, Clark Haggans, and Joey Porter are all on the bench among others. Super Bowl Hangover!
Which Makes me happy since I live in the Burgh!!!!!! And I really DON'T WANT TO HEAR THE CRAP I WILL GET IF WE LOSE!
Now if we win, It's possibly may be one of the quietest week I have ever had in the office.
If everyone that is dinged up doesn't play we have a great shot to pull this one out, and I still think the ST's may just decide this one.
__________________
 
The guy needs to sit it out for a week or so, regardless of playing against us. Another knock to the noggin and he could be seriously screwed up. If Burgess gets to run free like last week, then Big Ben could come crashing down. For good. And that's not good for the game.
 
The biggest factor in this game IMO, will be how we handle the various blitz looks off Pitt's 34 defense... We've struggled in pass pro the 3 times we've faced a 34 this year... If we allow Dick Lebeau to dictate the tone with his variety of stunts, it'll be a long game... Lebeau created the zone blitz and you can bet he'll look long and hard at the Bolt game film and see what they exploited with their jailbreak on the QB...

We've got to go quick to the flats with the backs and between the hashes with the TE and make Polamalu and their set of rush backers make plays in space... If we go with consistent deep drops and long developing patterns, Tui better be ready to go because AW will take a beating... Walsh is going to have to keep the Steeler defense off balance with his play calls and stay out of predictable long down and distances to keep the stunt packages in check...


I really hope Langston is ready to play because it's hard to forget how bad he looked the last time he played OT against Pitt...

Hopefully we'll catch them somewhat lackadaisical with their second road game in a row, the long flight trip west and looking ahead to playing the Donx next week, but I have a feeling Whisenhunt has had this one circled on his calendar for awhile...
 
Raiders get up for this game in a big way. Pittsburgh is a bit beat up and strange though it might sound, I'd rather face a dinged Roethisliberger over a healthy Charlie Batch.

Raiders - 20

Pittsburgh - 19
 
The whole time I was writing the preview I was thinking Pittsburgh was going to beat us about 31 -17. I couldn't help thinking that the win against Arizona, not matter how mistake filled, was going to be a very positive influence on the team. The players finally know they're not toiling in utter futility. And that will mean a lot.

On the playcalling. The Raiders will have to get some yards on 1st down, but I think more importantly, they'll have to get some yards on 2nd down. 2nd down seems to be our worst down as an offense. Even when we get a decent 1st, when we do nothing on 2nd, we're locked into a 3rd and long. When we've run on 1st and passed the next 2 downs, we're almost guaranteed to run on 1st when we complete the 3rd. We're really going to have to break that cycle somehow. And the best way to is start getting some yards on 2nd down.
 
I agree that we have to be a bit creative, but I would still favor a run oriented attack. I don't want to over-expose our shaky offensive line against a blitzing 34 defense, not just yet anyway. Moreover our WR/TE group haven't impressed much all year and I'm only confident in Ronald Curry's ability to catch the ball consistently and he plays limited reps.

I'd prefer to see us run about 75% on first down and have a 50/50 mix on 2nd down. Down & distance will obviously dictate what we do on 3rd down of course.

I'd like to see more bit more play action on first down, but we do need to be physical and committed to the run when it's all said & done.

The 'D' could/should be able to disrupt Pittsburgh's offense IMHO and they are improving. I think Arizona has a pretty talented offense and we handcuffed them pretty well.

I think we can mix Fabrian and Asomugha pretty well on Hines Ward and as others have mentioned, Chris Carr is a ticking time bomb to break one for a TD....
 
RaiderIVlife said:
I agree that we have to be a bit creative, but I would still favor a run oriented attack. I don't want to over-expose our shaky offensive line against a blitzing 34 defense, not just yet anyway. Moreover our WR/TE group haven't impressed much all year and I'm only confident in Ronald Curry's ability to catch the ball consistently and he plays limited reps.

I'd prefer to see us run about 75% on first down and have a 50/50 mix on 2nd down. Down & distance will obviously dictate what we do on 3rd down of course.

I disagree a bit. The only time I've seen the offense look in sync this season was last week when we seemed to mix it up pretty well on 1st down. Our offensive line isn't good enough to be predictable and Walter seemed pretty comfortable converting 3rd and longs last week. Granted, it was against Arizona... but still.

Besides... our running game will probably suffer with Jordan back in the lineup. :mad:

On defense, I agree 100% that facing Roethisliberger over Batch is a good thing.
 
We're gonna need some turnovers. Or Chris Carr to run one back. Or both.
 
massraider said:
We're gonna need some turnovers. Or Chris Carr to run one back. Or both.

Agreed.

No matter how poorly the Steelers are playing, or how injured Roeth is, they are the Super Bowl champions until someone takes the Lombardi from them.

We'll need help in this game in the form of a Fumble runback, INT return, Punt return or something else rare that changes momentum.

On a straight up game play for play, they'll beat us by 14 to 20.
 
Back
Top