jatfly
AKA:Burgraider
- Joined
- Oct 10, 2006
- Messages
- 3,413
- Reaction score
- 197
Raiders' offense looks better already
By Michael Ash on August 13, 2007 12:47 AM
By Michael Ash on August 13, 2007 12:47 AM
As most NFL fans know, it's difficult to make judgments about a team based on the games in the preseason. Star players are often sitting on the bench to make sure they're healthy when the real battles begin, and coaches rarely give their strategies away when the wins and losses don't matter.
The early action in 2006 may have been the biggest example yet of how meaningless the preseason really is. The Oakland Raiders went 4-1 in five exhibition contests but finished the regular season with the worst record in the league at 2-14. The Indianapolis Colts went 1-3 and ultimately won the Super Bowl.
So why do people try to analyze games that don't actually count?
Well, there are some things that can be gleaned from the preseason. It may not be a good sign if a quarterback who's competing for the starting job comes out and throws a few interceptions right away.
Similarly, if a receiver drops every pass thrown his way, a running back can't hold onto the ball, or a kicker can't put it between the uprights, it doesn't matter if it's the regular season or not.
And along those same lines, just as it's noticeable when a player isn't performing, it stands out when a unit shows vast improvement over its efforts from the previous year.
Sure, Oakland's offense wasn't perfect against the Arizona Cardinals on Saturday night. Far from it, in fact. Josh McCown started the game at quarterback and had two quick three-and-outs before marching the Raiders downfield in a drive that was ugly even by preseason standards. McCown lost the snap twice and the offensive line was whistled for three false starts, but aided by two costly Arizona penalties - a personal foul and pass interference - the seven-minute drive ended with Dominic Rhodes punching it into the end zone from 1 yard out.
The offense wasn't suddenly running like a well-oiled machine. It would be unfair to expect that kind of change in such a short time. But it was clear from watching the game that the draconian "bed and breakfast" system of Art Shell and Tom Walsh has been tossed out like yesterday's garbage.
Even in the preseason, Lane Kiffin's offense looked more productive and on par with today's NFL than anything the Raiders ran a year ago. The team moved the ball both on the ground and through the air, and the play-calling - screens, play-action, quick drops - helped keep the Cardinals' defense guessing.
Perhaps the best sign was that there seemed to be some life on the offensive line, which didn't give up a sack until the third quarter. The line opened up holes for the running game and gave the quarterbacks time to get rid of the ball. Again, not everything was perfect, but the progress that's been made was obvious.
There are still plenty of growing pains ahead, and it's true that the offense has nowhere to go but up. Still, though, if the unit looked this fresh during the typically vanilla preseason, what will Kiffin have up his sleeve once the games start to matter?
On Saturday night, for the first time in a long time, the Raiders looked like a team being coached by someone who knows what he's doing.
The early action in 2006 may have been the biggest example yet of how meaningless the preseason really is. The Oakland Raiders went 4-1 in five exhibition contests but finished the regular season with the worst record in the league at 2-14. The Indianapolis Colts went 1-3 and ultimately won the Super Bowl.
So why do people try to analyze games that don't actually count?
Well, there are some things that can be gleaned from the preseason. It may not be a good sign if a quarterback who's competing for the starting job comes out and throws a few interceptions right away.
Similarly, if a receiver drops every pass thrown his way, a running back can't hold onto the ball, or a kicker can't put it between the uprights, it doesn't matter if it's the regular season or not.
And along those same lines, just as it's noticeable when a player isn't performing, it stands out when a unit shows vast improvement over its efforts from the previous year.
Sure, Oakland's offense wasn't perfect against the Arizona Cardinals on Saturday night. Far from it, in fact. Josh McCown started the game at quarterback and had two quick three-and-outs before marching the Raiders downfield in a drive that was ugly even by preseason standards. McCown lost the snap twice and the offensive line was whistled for three false starts, but aided by two costly Arizona penalties - a personal foul and pass interference - the seven-minute drive ended with Dominic Rhodes punching it into the end zone from 1 yard out.
The offense wasn't suddenly running like a well-oiled machine. It would be unfair to expect that kind of change in such a short time. But it was clear from watching the game that the draconian "bed and breakfast" system of Art Shell and Tom Walsh has been tossed out like yesterday's garbage.
Even in the preseason, Lane Kiffin's offense looked more productive and on par with today's NFL than anything the Raiders ran a year ago. The team moved the ball both on the ground and through the air, and the play-calling - screens, play-action, quick drops - helped keep the Cardinals' defense guessing.
Perhaps the best sign was that there seemed to be some life on the offensive line, which didn't give up a sack until the third quarter. The line opened up holes for the running game and gave the quarterbacks time to get rid of the ball. Again, not everything was perfect, but the progress that's been made was obvious.
There are still plenty of growing pains ahead, and it's true that the offense has nowhere to go but up. Still, though, if the unit looked this fresh during the typically vanilla preseason, what will Kiffin have up his sleeve once the games start to matter?
On Saturday night, for the first time in a long time, the Raiders looked like a team being coached by someone who knows what he's doing.