The Poop on Shoop

hawaiianboy

Unfuckupable
Joined
Oct 5, 2006
Messages
29,436
Reaction score
24,138
Hope I'm not stepping on any toes by starting a thread here...

From Jerry McDonald's blog:


The poop on Shoop

Posted by Jerry McDonald - NFL Writer on Friday at 4:06 pm


Tim Brown’s latest critique on the Raiders Friday morning included his observation on KNBR’s “Murph and Mac Show'’ that tight ends coach John Shoop may be involved in playcalling as the Raiders struggle to move the ball under the direction of offensive coodinator Tom Walsh.

“I hear they’re trying to make some changes, trying to go back to a couple of things that (Bill) Callahan and (Jon) Gruden were doing, but they have to do them in a very subtle way,'’ Brown said. “They have a young guy on that team, I can’t think of his name right now . . . he’s a quarterbacks coach who was with Gruden in Tampa and called plays in Chicago for awhile.'’

When asked if he was talking about Shoop, Brown said, “Yeah, Shoop. I think they’re going to try and get him involved in the playcalling a little bit more and see if they can make it happen.'’

Shell was asked about it Friday and managed to break into a smile.

“I don’t know where all this information is coming from, I really don’t,'’ Shell said “I look at these things sometimes and I just laugh and say it’s like somebody’s taking it and throwing it up against a wall and hoping it sticks . . . somebody will say something and then all of a sudden, `Oh, maybe that’s it.’ There’s no truth to that.'’

Even acknowledging the fact that the Raiders can move in mysterious ways _ Walsh could have his duties change and no one would know for weeks _ Brown’s scenario is unlikely.

Shoop did in fact work under Gruden for a year in Tampa Bay, but that would probably make him less likely to be Oakland’s next play caller rather than more likely.

Shoop also was an offensive coordinator for the Bears, orchestrating a conservative scheme for a defense-oriented team that was so reviled by Chicago fans there was a Web site entitled firejohnshoop.com.

After Norv Turner was fired, Shoop received an interview with Davis. Whether Davis was seriously considering Shoop as a head coaching candidate, only he knows for sure. But Shoop made a tactical error by talking about the interview with a Chicago reporter at the Senior Bowl. Davis would rather his assistant coaches be seen and not heard.

When Shell got the job, the word is Shoop was almost out of the loop. Shell hired Walsh as offensive coordinator with the blessing of Davis. Jim McElwain was hired out of Michigan State to coach quarterbacks and Shoop was named tight ends coach.

Unless Shell is full of hot air, he remains committed to Walsh and the offensive system, and he’s certainly not of a mind to encorporate the Gruden-Callahan system by increasing Shoop’s input.

Neither is Davis, who tolerated those offenses only because they won three consecutive division titles.

While Brown repeated his claim that the Raiders’ system is outdated and essentially obsolete, Shell said any tweaks to the offense would be minor. He talked earlier in the week of being more aware of underneath routes, but don’t expect the Raiders to suddenly begin flooding the field with 4-yard completions.

“I like our offense, and it’s not archaic, as some people think it is,'’ Shell said. “I look at some of the things we’re doing, some of the things we did in pre-season. We’re studying the 49ers, and some of the things we did against the 49ers (in pre-season), teams are using those same things. Is that archaic? No. It’s a copycat league.

“Teams have a certain idea of the system they want to run. You run a system you believe in, and you can’t be jumping all over the doggone board with your system because some might not think it’s the right system for you. You’ve got to do what’s best for your team. I like our system and what we do.'’

Other Brown observations Friday morning:

– On Jerry Porter’s exile on the inactive list: “I really think this is Art Shell. I don’t think this is Al Davis . . . if Art wanted him to play, he would be playing. But I think they got off to such a bad start . . . . both of them are so bull-headed that neither one can go and just restart their computer and get this thing going on the same page.

`Until one of them breaks, and says, `Hey, man, I apologize even though I don’t think I did anything wrong,’ then J.P. will be where is right now, not suiting up.'’

–On Randy Moss’ recent radio interview: “We taped our (televsion) show last evening, and we played it back 40 times because everyone wants to make sure we’re hearing what we’re hearing . . . those kinds of comments are deadly for a program, deadly for an organization that is already struggling. It sort of leaves the locker room even more devoid of leadership when a guy like Randy steps out and says something like that.'’

One of Brown’s comments brought to mind Rich Gannon’s memorable “state of the Raiders'’ address the day before Callahan was fired after the 2003 season.

That day, Gannon said, “I wouldn’t say I’d take a torch to the place, but it wouldn’t be far from it.'’

More than three years later, Brown is equally incendiary.

“I’m telling people right now, maybe they just need to get the old match, and the gasoline, and burn the whole thing up and start it all over, because what they have going now, it will take years and years before they can get all those same coaches and same players on the same page.'’

Shell said he and Walsh are weathering the assault which hits teams with losing records.

“Nobody likes to be criticized. I don’t care who you are,'’ Shell said. “But we understand that’s part of the business that we’re involved in, so you expect it. The only expectation everyone has is to win. You expect to win, and if you don’t win, the criticism will come. I understand it and he understands it.'’
 
I agree to a certain point that scheme is notthat archaic, but the incomplete way it’s been implemented certainly seems to be… The Coryell system was one that stretched the field both vertically and horizontally… You see that in versions based of the offense in Cincy, Pitt, Detroit and previous to this year, St Louis and KC… Thus far all it seems like is we’re too intent on going to the head all the time instead of working the body as well to put it in boxing terms…

Now replacing Walsh with Shoop is probably akin to replacing a jab to the crotch with a pock in the eye, but at least it would be an acknowledgement that what we’re doing so far has been painfully bad to witness… Now of course, Shell could simply be giving us the Sgt Schultz coachspeak as coaches are want to do, but it would sure be nice to get some affirmation that we’re not stubbornly clinging to something that isn’t working… I’m sure Art doesn’t want to publically sacrifice Walsh or give future opponents a heads up, but at some point they’ve got to sell tickets and get people into the HOT…

I’m not particularly crazy about the way Brown keeps popping off… He’s really not helping Art out much… He makes some good points, but somehow it seems more imbittered and self serving than it seems like it is out of general concern for his old organization…
 
I know nothing. nothing. Heh.

What's Shell suppose to say...``yeah I'm kinda trying to get my boy some help"?

It's tricky but Tim Brown may know more than Art thinks.
 
I didn't see the interview, but I'll interpret Art's smile as him getting caught with his hand in the cookie jar. So far as I remember, every time he's smiled, there's been some truth to what was asked. When he frowns it's been B.S. Just what I remember, not an exhaustive analysis.

So I think Shoop was brought into the strategy loop (pardon the rhyme). Whether he'll do any play calling or whether any scheme changes will happen are doubtful in my book. I just think they're looking at the sequence of plays and how they're setting things up. I would be looking outside the box at this point. The main problem with looking outside the box of a tight scheme is that outside the box could be counter-productive and likely to disrupt the ability to get the scheme up and running.

The point of looking outside the box with Shoop is that he's worked in different styles and might have decent insight to their common deployment elements. Not asking your experienced assistants for their input would be idiotic, but it doesn't mean a change of the guard as Brown speculates.
 
Pardon the quick hit style of this post, but...

"You’ve got to do what’s best for your team. I like our system and what we do.'’

Seems to me that Art was talking out of both sides of that smile...whether he even realizes or not.
 
Rupert said:
I didn't see the interview, but I'll interpret Art's smile as him getting caught with his hand in the cookie jar. So far as I remember, every time he's smiled, there's been some truth to what was asked. When he frowns it's been B.S.


Wow, Art's got a tell?...

Just like Bones slipping his dentures in and out every time he's got a flush draw...
 
Hey Art is in a tough situation I think as Rupert pointed out. The flip side is Hboy's take. I'm not there to really be able to say who's right but personally I don't think this whole mess is doing the team any good. And the more we pile up losses the worse it's likely to get.

Porter is a dick. No question there. On one hand I'd like Porter on the field becuase he's the seond best receiver we have. On the other hand I'd like him shipped out of Oakland yesterday. How's that for a dance?
 
hawaiianboy said:
Wow, Art's got a tell?...

Just like Bones slipping his dentures in and out every time he's got a flush draw...

And Stepper's Adam's Apple doing the two-step with pocket aces.


If I never read another Tim Brown quote again, I'll be happy.
 
CrossBones said:
Porter is a dick. No question there. On one hand I'd like Porter on the field becuase he's the seond best receiver we have. On the other hand I'd like him shipped out of Oakland yesterday. How's that for a dance?

You got a partner in that dance. I lean towards the "let him rot" side right now, because I figure, we don't have time to get a pass off, who cares which WR is running 10 yards, then looking back, slowing down, shaking his head, and jogging back to the huddle.

Now, if Walter drops back, scans the field for 5 seconds, and can't find anyone open, maybe someone can talk me into breaking the seal on Porter.

I fully admit that if Porter played right tackle, I might not be so principled.
 
massraider said:
If I never read another Tim Brown quote again, I'll be happy.

I hate to say it, but no man has done more to tarnish his image as a 'legend' or idol AFTER RETIREMENT for me than Tim Brown.

Dude's got to shut up and go golfing or something.

That being said, he's still one of my all time fave's, dammit. :mad:
 
massraider said:
You got a partner in that dance. I lean towards the "let him rot" side right now, because I figure, we don't have time to get a pass off, who cares which WR is running 10 yards, then looking back, slowing down, shaking his head, and jogging back to the huddle.

The let him rot faction might be more attractive to me if we could still Keyshawn the guy like Tampa did, but the potential for him to poison other players is too great for comfort with him there at practice every day...


I fully admit that if Porter played right tackle, I might not be so principled.


Ha!... With run stopping DT's being at the premium they are, I've already been able to justify that Albert Haynesworth is just misunderstood and that the Raiders should give him a chance...
 
Bones jacked this thread up by putting his Porter response in the wrong thread didn't he?...
 
hawaiianboy said:
Bones jacked this thread up by putting his Porter response in the wrong thread didn't he?...
You're just mad cuz I busted you for workin' it at the Raider half time show. HA! Beautiful. You don't want me to link that pic again so you?
 
I don't get the Tim Brown hate. The guy is as much an insider as we have access to. I very seriously doubt he's making shit up or trying to undermine the staff/team.

When Timmy talks, I tend to listen.
 
The "Hate" (that's not really the right word for it) -- comes from years of Timmy running his mouth instead of playin' ball. Lot fo Raider fans got tired of that. Maybe it was the losing. dunno.

Other than that Timmy is GOLD.
 
If we would have had an O-line that year...
 
Crow said:
If we would have had an O-line that year...

We would have won six games.
 
Crow said:
...out of our first 8.

Possibly.

But it was the 5 game skid in the end that sealed Bugel and the Raiders fate, IMO.

Such gems as our 31-3 drubbing at Mile High, the 30 to nothing shutout KC pitched on us, and the 20-9 homeloss against the Jags.

I'd take Art over Bugel any day of the week, but its Walsh who is leading this offense into the ground, IMO.

When I heard Shoop would possibly be calling some plays I got excited. Then I remembered it's John Shoop. Then I cried.
 
Back
Top