The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly - Week 2

Rupert

The Long Wind
Joined
Nov 2, 2005
Messages
10,109
Reaction score
3,428
The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly
Week 2: Raiders at Baltimore

The Good

Andrew Walter being ready to play after Aaron Brooks injured his shoulder. The best part of his game in week two for me was not the nice completions nor was it his composure in the pocket. For me, the best part of his work against Baltimore happened right after the missed TD pass to Moss. Walter stalked the sidelines. At first I thought he was liked a caged lion wanting to get back onto the field, and that might have been part of it. I thought about what I’d be thinking after that attempt, “Why the hell did Randy put his hand up if he wasn’t going to run the route?” As the camera stayed on him I saw him say, “Where’s Randy?” Eventually, they found each other and talked about the missed opportunity. When those two get on the same page, the TD’s will start flowing.

But I’m not going to stop there. Did anyone see how cool and composed Walter was in the pocket? He stood in there, slid around the pressure (most of the time), and threw some pretty passes. He isn’t the Raiders’ QB of the future; he’s the Raiders QB of the present.

The defense really stepped it up. If their performance in week one against San Diego showed promise, they started to deliver against Baltimore. No sacks in week one? Two against Baltimore in week two. No turnovers in week one against San Diego? One against Baltimore in week two, and opportunities for a couple more that slipped through their grasp.

More on the defense. How about holding Baltimore to three field goals on their first three possessions? They had exceptional field position on those three drives, and even if they self-destructed on one drive, we did enough to hold them to a field goal each time.

Okay, the offensive line was not good overall, but they did give Walter a couple series of decent protection. Sure it was in the second and fourth quarters when Baltimore’s defense had worn down. Against San Diego, they didn’t have a good series, just a couple plays. But this was Baltimore, which already looks like the best defense in football. You have to give them credit for raising their game after complete humiliation against San Diego. They had every reason to expect to be beaten regularly and often in Baltimore, and they stiffened up.

Chad Slaughter did a nice job on the line in place of Robert Gallery.

Terdell Sands throwing guys around again.

The Bad

Six turnovers. Brooks couldn’t handle the snap? I’m sorry, call me a conspiracy theorist, but he was either instructed to take a dive so Walter could play, or he did it on purpose so he wouldn’t have to take a beating for the second week in a row. Then Walter gets into the act by dropping another two snaps? I can accept that a little since he probably didn’t take many snaps in practice from Grove, but come on kid.

Okay, the offensive line did a nice job in pass protection (not a great job, and maybe just barely approaching average), but their run blocking was horrible. Okay, it was Baltimore, an excellent run defense last season, and they were able to stand up and convert a fourth and inches, but for the second week in a row they failed to establish the run.

Giving Baltimore a very short field for their first three drives was horrible. You can't do that and expect your defense to hold the opponent out on a regular basis.

The Ugly

The defense gave up that touchdown drive late in the first half for no apparent reason. They were probably already drinking the ice cold sports drink in the locker room. A close second was the fourth quarter drive after the offense failed to convert on fourth down. Once again it looked like they wanted to be anywhere but on the field. If that’s the case, bring in the subs and let them play for pride.

The safety. Barry Sims almost tackled Walter in the end zone himself. Of all the protections breakdowns, that was probably the worst.

Randy Moss watching Ray Lewis tip the ball to himself to get the interception. Uhhh, Randy, how about trying to break it up? Offense is not a spectator sport, at least not if you’re suiting up.

Speaking of spectating, what was Johnny Morant doing half-assing it on the last interception?

The opening kick-off return. I watched Ronald Curry’s uniform do an unnatural stretch that helped spring that run along the sideline, but I guessed that flags don’t get thrown against obvious Baltimore holding penalties (that stretches all the way back to an infamous play in Oakland in an AFC Championship game). That idea was supported several times in Baltimore’s first couple offensive series. Then the flags started flying for obvious infractions.

Speaking of obvious penalties, why is Chris McAlister, supposedly the best cover corner in the league, resorting to grabbing, holding, and hitting past five yards? Is he slipping? I know that’s what Charles Woodson started doing on his decline from Pro Bowl status. Coincidence? Regardless, those penalties were ugly.
 
Last edited:
Randy Moss: I'm pretty disappointed in this guy. He's a part time player. When he knows he isn't getting the ball he sulks and goes through the motions. He's a lousy route runner but then I guess we knew that.

Somebody once complained about building your offense around a wide receiver. Yeah, bad idea.

Walter throws a nice ball.

Our OL is the wrost in the NFL right now. Grove is a bust, Walker is terrible and McDumbfuck needs to be replaced by that other rookie who looked decent today. Gallery is the best of a bad nbunch of fuckin' dog shit.

The defense has come together nicely. Sam Williams hurt in week two? Who would have thought. Fuck. I'm sick of football.

We should be 2-2 by week five. :rolleyes:
 
Nice read Rup.................but Art said yesterday that Brooks is still his guy.:confused:
 
Rob said:
Nice read Rup.................but Art said yesterday that Brooks is still his guy.:confused:
If Brooks starts I will lose all faith in Art Shell. That is simply the wrong decision for this team.
 
Not much to say about stats and numbers, they all tell horrible things. The defence was playing like if it was Bastogne... carrying the team on their shoulders, but what a burden.

Despite all the errors, watching Andrew Walter in control was a breath of fresh air. I hope the future is bright with him. Forget about the INts and fumbles, almost every QB in the NFL would'va made lots of mistakes with such a protection.

Pass Protection was a little better, but in no way allows the Raider QB to use seven steps or attempt a long throw, simply there's no time. Add to this the absolute lack of holes for the RB and we have the formula to go scoreless.

Sadly I don't think the line can improve enough. I've always thought Gallery is a bust, and Langston Walker a backup. Sims was our liability in our best times this century, go figure. Grove and McQuistan haven't done good, thoigh McQuistan's only a rook. How do you correct this problem? You have to bring in a lot of new people.

But we have to see the problem as a whole, it's not only the OL, though it may zeroed as the main culprit, is the playcalling, the prepararation, the attitude. the Raiders offence looks like they are in the first minicamp of an expansion team. They all seem to have their knowledge set to zero. Way to go.
 
The Mayor and his offenive game plan blows. This IMO is where Art Shell has failed. He surrounded himself with a guy who just is out of touch with today's NFL. And frankly it's not going to change a lot because it's the only thing Walsh knows.
 
I dunno how much responsibility relies on Walsh and how much Shell. It seems the offense is working like Walsh push the buttons. In order to fix a problem, you have to admit it. And while they seem to do so, The Raiders are not precisely taking note; they know the line aint blocking, but must think is a matter of work, while it may be a matter of decissions. First our so called star -he is shown often in NFL network ads-, Robert Gallery is far from delivering as expected, many call them a bust -put me in- and cannot be considered our strength. Langston Walker has never been up to the task, as a guard he played more or less decently, but as a DE he seems to be slow. McQuistan is a rookie and has the benefit of the doubt, he was thrown into the mix too soon. As for Barry Sims, at 32 he won't get better, and man, he was never outstanding. Grove can be labeled as a a work in progress. Can you teach these guys to play at NFL caliber? if not, we better get some other people.
 
Andrew Walter has shown enough promise in his first game even with his occasional mistakes that he has more or equal value playing now than Brooks with his inconsistent play.

We have an offensive line that is a work in progress. Art has said that it may take upto midseason for them to jell. We have a rookie in McQuistan thrown into the fire and we are learning yet another scheme.

Brooks is not our quarterback of the future...Walter is. If we keep playing Brooks, and Walter is our plan for future years, then once the offensive line jells, we then have to spend another few games in the regular season next year to get Walter up to speed (receiver tendencies, new plays, getting rid of kinks)

Why not let Walter and the offensive and the skill players all the progress at the same time? Walter gets to learn the receivers tendencies (and we know now that Collins and Brooks took some time with this), he gets learn and expand the playbook rather than starting with a vanilla offense, and the offensive line gets to learn Walter's tendencies as well.

If we are a work in progress, let us all progress at the same rate.

Another thing, the offensive line and skill players will be helped by Walter's deameanor, his coolness and confidence on the field. I am sure that they are all in a fog now trying to digest everything. If they see a rookie come in (Walter) and exhibit such traits, it can't help but be transferred to the rest of the young players.

Whitted is not very good...he doesn't even know where to line up. Watch Moss giving him directions on where to stand and what to do.

Players are already making noise as to wanting him to play. Moss wants him to play. I can't say any more than what I have said dozens of times before...don't keep punishing a player that is working hard on and off the field.

Staying on Porter, I saw him talking with Walter a couple of times..once when he did something bad. Porter gets a pat on the back from me.

For me, I love Randy Moss. Sure he didn't tackle the player who intercepted the ball. He has never been known to be a good tackler. However, Randy does many things great. He helps out his fellow receivers, he has a strong work ethic, he gets open more times than not, he goes to his quarterback, both Walter and Brooks, and discusses what went wrong. Give me more Randy Moss types and I am a happy guy.

We did better yesterday but have a long ways to go. Our defense was great...stamina included. Rob Ryan and Keith Millard know how to coach. Our special teams did well for the most part. Our offense is awakening a little but still has some sand in their eyes...we will get better.
 
Playing Walter may not be a matter for the future, it is for now. As soon as he get some experience, he nwill be the best option. Right now, Brooks has the leading edge, but under the current circumstances that ain't worth a shitload.

Probably the only positive thing this year may be the developement of our new QB.
 
What I meant was that Walter is the one we see leading this team in the future...right now he is training for that but the wins won't come without the offensive jelling. Brooks might get us some victories now and be a little further ahead than Walter but our real goal is not get a few wins with Brooks but to prepare for the future with Walter.
 
I agree. I doesn't make sense to collect a couple wins (if that is actually what it means) and keep Brooks in while the OL jells and then break in Walter next season and go through the growing pains again.

We're already going through the growing pains for the OL, it makes sense to go through the growing pains of the QB simultaneously instead of drag out the inconsistent play.
 
Rupert said:
I agree. I doesn't make sense to collect a couple wins (if that is actually what it means) and keep Brooks in while the OL jells and then break in Walter next season and go through the growing pains again.

We're already going through the growing pains for the OL, it makes sense to go through the growing pains of the QB simultaneously instead of drag out the inconsistent play.
That's why we should have blown this thing up two years ago...we'd have been so much further ahead.
 
Sometimes learning through bad experiences is not good for all QBs, specially when they lack the character, but it seems to me Walter has the poise and takes pride in trying to correct errors and do things well. Actually his performance is far from a top QB, he has been innacurate at times, and some decisions were not OK, but this is normal in a novice QB. As long as he doesn't get hurt in the process it's all OK. Undoubtedly he will be a punching bag for defensive linemen if the Raiders OL doesn't improve, and sadly, the necessary amount of change may be too much for them. We probably need new personnel. In the meantime, developing our new marshall will make things a little more enjoyable.
 
CrossBones said:
That's why we should have blown this thing up two years ago...we'd have been so much further ahead.
What do you mean "blown this thing up"?
 
Abelardo: Yeah, it's a crap shoot throwing a kid in there. If they experience instant success they might not be prepared for tough times. If they start behind a turnstile line, they might not be used to setting their feet when they do get the time. Marc Wilson and Jim Everett come to mind. They never got comfortable in the pocket after taking a beating one season. Chris Carr seems okay after all his lumps in Houston, but I haven't seen extended footage.
 
I mean going with the youth movement right after Gannon got hurt...the next year. Instead we tried to band aid it together and lost a lot of time developing a rebuilding strategy. I guess it's hard for Al to admit the Raiders are rebuillding but had we two years ago we'd be way ahead of the curve.

Now you go back to the Arcade! :p
 
Hindsight is often 20/20. I know a lot of us figured that was a good time to go heavy into the youth movement. Water under the bridge unfortunately. It's never easy for a guy to say, I'll accept losing for a couple seasons, and incredibly tough for guys like Al Davis and George Steinbrenner. Still, they make their mistakes.
 
Good read, Rupert. Nicely done.
 
Thank you Crow. What have you been up to?
 
Back
Top