Raider Outlaw
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 12, 2009
- Messages
- 45,409
- Reaction score
- 47,548
We should have tanked that game.
Fat ass probably said some shit like you know we got a spot on the staff waiting for you when you get fired, lol.
We should have tanked that game.
Rat Jr. started the 2nd half with 6 straight passes. IDK why, but Spags clearly had him figured out. Took him too long to go to Jennings while mixing in touches to McC.
The same game you were watching, except you have a shit memory. McC had 80 yards on 14 touches in the 1st half and the ‘9ers scored 10 points, 1 punt. After Rat Jr. panicked at halftime and went away from McC, ‘9ers had 3 consecutive 3-and-out punts. When Rat Jr. went back to McC for the last 2 drives of regulation and 1 drive in overtime, McC had 80 yards on 15 touches and the ‘9ers scored 13 points.What game were you watching? They shut that shit down for a long stretch after their first TD until the fourth quarter. When were they performing well most of the second and third quarter? McCaffrey got stonewalled after the first quarter and a half, and Perdy went ice cold after he started 8 of 9 until the fourth quarter. Kittle, Aiyuk, and Samuel were completely eliminated from the game. They didn't go to Jennings more often because teams don't look to their fourth or fifth receiver to be the hero, lol.
Selective memoryI mean did they really not try running the ball? McCaffrey has 22 carries for the game and averaged 3.6 yards per carry:
You’re wrong. The O moved when McC was getting touches—both running and receiving. When Rat Jr. came out throwing to others, 3 consecutive 3 and outs.If they were getting 3.5 a carry after the first quarter. That 3.5 stat is heavily skewed by that they were getting chunks early. It was more like two yards or less after that. I saw a lot of either no gain or negative yard rushing plays, and once that happened, they were dead in the water offensively for the rest of the downs because Kittle, Aiyuk, and Samuel weren't doing shit. They even sniffed those Samuel run plays that he's well known for out every time they tried that. The secret weapon I kept hearing about from 49er fans, Mitchell, didn't do shit either.
You’re wrong. They O moved when McC was getting touches—both running and receiving. When Rat Jr. came out throwing to others, 3 consecutive 3 and outs.
STFUPeople are looking at the numbers on paper and not how the game actually played out. Like @Sleet is talking like they were consistently getting 3.5 a carry or close to that every time they handed off. They ran the ball plenty. Like DK said, it went from five six yards a carry early, to it was no gain or one yard, two yards after that first quarter. That's their offense. They usually get those yards and are in third and five or less. Then, they hit big plays off that in the passing game. I think the bigger story is that with all of their pass weapons, none of them stepped up and made plays. Collectively, they didn't have a hundred yards between Samuel, Kittle, and Debo. I thought one of them had to have a good game to win, and I thought it would be Kittle. He was the worst one. Probably not going to win when that happens.
I wanted more McC. I wanted him to go over 100 yards. He and Jennings were their best match ups.McCaffrey did his job, 80 yards rushing and 80 yards receiving. It’s kind of hard to blame the 9ers for not using him more running the ball? Dude had 160 yards from scrimmage, what more do you want?
Kittle has what? A messily 4 yards receiving, Deebo 3 for 33 yards. Aiyuk 3 for 39 yards. Too much blame on the Rat for not rushing McCaffrey more, that wasn’t the problem, and it wasn’t like he was chipping away at 4 or 5 yards a pop.
The same game you were watching, except you have a shit memory. McC had 80 yards on 14 touches in the 1st half and the ‘9ers scored 10 points, 1 punt. After Rat Jr. panicked at halftime and went away from McC, ‘9ers had 3 consecutive 3-and-out punts. When Rat Jr. went back to McC for the last 2 drives of regular OL and 1 drive in overtime, McC had 80 yards on 15 touches and the ‘9ers scored 13 points.
1st half SF possessions:
Total: 32 plays (14 McC touches) 204 yards: 10 points
- 5 plays (4 McC touches) 48 yards: fumble
- 4 plays (1 McC touch) 16 yards, 3 penalties: punt
- 10 plays (4 McC touches) 46 yards: FG
- 4 plays (1 McC touch) 21 yards: punt
- 8 plays (3 McC touches) 67 yards: TD
- 1 play (1 McC touch) 6 yards: Halftime
1st 3 2nd half possessions (McC 1 touch):
- KC’s D gave up 10 points, forced 1 punt
- McC: 14 touches, 80 yards, 1 TD, 1 fumble
Rest of Game: 2 possessions + 1 in OT
- First 2: 6 passes, -2 yards, penalty: 2 punts
- 3rd: 2 passes, 1 run, 0 yards: punt
Overall: McC was 42% of SF’s 382 yards
- McC rushing: 47 yards
- McC receiving: 33 yards
- McC rushing: 80 yards
- McC receiving: 80 yards
LolGo back and watch. You were watching some alternate version of the game or some shit.
McCaffrey did his job, 80 yards rushing and 80 yards receiving. It’s kind of hard to blame the 9ers for not using him more running the ball? Dude had 160 yards from scrimmage, what more do you want?
Kittle has what? A messily 4 yards receiving, Deebo 3 for 33 yards. Aiyuk 3 for 39 yards. Too much blame on the Rat for not rushing McCaffrey more, that wasn’t the problem, and it wasn’t like he was chipping away at 4 or 5 yards a pop.
I don’t “seem” anything.I'm well aware of his stats. most of that was the first quarter and a half. You seem to have not noticed that the Chiefs made adjustments. Even the 49er beat writers said as much, but you have some kind of weird insight that doesn't exist that they went away from McCaffrey, and that's why their offense slowed down. Chiefs have literally done that all year. I say it every time we're here watching a game and commenting with them. Better get that shit before the second half because they don't let anybody score on them after then.
That’s how I saw it too.Lol
Rat Jr. lost the game in the 3rd quarter when he went away from McC. When he went back to McC, the O moved again.
Qtr | Plays | Yds | Rsh | Yds | Rec | Yds |
1 | 5 | 48 | 3 | 19 | 1 | 11 |
1 | 4 | 16 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 8 |
1 | 10 | 46 | 4 | 11 | 1 | 1 |
2 | 4 | 21 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
2 | 8 | 67 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 27 |
2 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
3 | 3 | -1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
3 | 3 | -1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7 |
3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
3 | 12 | 75 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
4 | 7 | 40 | 3 | 8 | 0 | 0 |
4 | 1 | -1 | 2 | 8 | 0 | 0 |
5 | 13 | 66 | 6 | 26 | 2 | 26 |
74 | 382 | 23 | 88 | 8 | 80 |
I wanted more McC. I wanted him to go over 100 yards. He and Jennings were their best match ups.
The point is, Rat Jr. had a winning hand—feed McC. He went away from it to start the 2nd half. The ‘9ers scored 13 points when they went back to it.
Rsh | Yds | Rec | Yds |
7 | 30 | 3 | 20 |
3 | 11 | 2 | 27 |
2 | 5 | 1 | 7 |
5 | 16 | 0 | 0 |
6 | 26 | 2 | 26 |
Don’t “guess” and make up shit.Yep. The bottom line is that none of the receivers stepped up. That one play that McDuffie deflected in the end zone was one of them that they had to have. McCaffrey had 30 touches in the game. I guess @Sleet wanted him to have every touch in the game. Defense has something to do with if you can throw him more passes, but the rushing attempts were what they were. The over/under coming into the game for him to rush was 18, and I'm guessing that's based on his regular workload that they arrived at that number. So I don't know what you're talking about. Guess you thought he should have gotten 35 rush attempts so he could fumble some more. Guy literally broke a Super Bowl record for rushing and receiving yards for a back. He wasn't the problem.
That’s how I saw it too.![]()