Raiders YouTube Vids

Copyright 1981 The Washington Post
The Washington Post

January 23, 1981, Friday, Final Edition

SECTION: Sports; E1

LENGTH: 2095 words

HEADLINE: AL DAVIS;
Black-Clad Raiders Are Like Boss;
Davis And His Team Controversial Winners;
Man in Black Has the Golden Touch With Raiders

BYLINE: By Paul Attner, Washington Post Staff Writer

DATELINE: NEW ORLEANS, Jan. 22, 1981

BODY:
Amid the hype and opulence of Super Bowl 15, Al Davis, the brains of the Oakland Raider organization, lurks in the shadows. And the script for this game couldn't be unfolding better if he had written it himself.

Of course, an Oakland win over Philadelphia in Sunday's 6 p.m. contest would be the ultimate climax to the story -- and the ultimate embarrassment to his long-time adversary, NFL Commissioner Pete Rozelle, who faces a February court battle with Davis, the club's managing general partner, over the Raiders' attempt to move to Los Angeles.

Davis and his team thrive in the controversial atmosphere that has engulfed his Super Bowl. The Raiders are being cast as the underdogs, and they have turned the game into a sort of great crusade to kick sand in the face of an unappreciative sports world.

"No one thought we would have a winning season this year, then no one thought we'd get into the playoffs, then no one thought we'd win a playoff game," said guard Gene Upshaw, who repeats this vintage, chip-on-the-shoulder Raider message over and over. "No one thinks we should be here either. Only we think we belong. Now it's up to us to prove we are right."

A Super Bowl win would supply the final touches on what already has become Davis' proudest achievement.

He took a team that needed to be rebuilt, traded its two best players, stood firm when a retread quarterback became a starter and then watched as Rozelle and the rest of the NFL establishment blanched while the Raiders marched to New Orleans.

And all the while, Davis was waging his savage, bitter battle with the league over the proposed switch to Los Angeles. He has turned his showcase of NFL games into his personal calling card. And that card is stamped, at least in the opinion of Ron Wolfe, Oakland's personnel director, with one word: "genius."

A sampler from the Al Davis legend, which has grown and thrived over the 34 years he has been in football:

The Raiders are trailing New Orleans, 35-14, at halftime in a 1979 game. Davis, who claims he no longer really coaches the Raiders (he coached them from 1963 to 1966), orders a change from a three to a four-man defensive front. Oakland wins, 42-35.

He once wanted to move a wide receiver, Drew Buie, through waivers. So he contacted 12 teams, talking trade for an end, while placing Buie on the waiver list. The other clubs, figuring Buie was a dud, ignored him. Davis then re-signed him.

Foes long have accused Davis of watering the Oakland Coliseum field to turn it into a slow track. Hours before the AFC championship game two weeks ago in San Diego, it began raining. "They say Al has connections, but this is too much," was the running gag throughout the press box.

He had been coach of the Raiders for just eight days before Harry Wismer, then owner of the New York Jets, was accusing Oakland of illegally signing wide receiver Art Powell, who became the first of Davis' successful player reclamation projects.

He persuaded Edward DeBartolo, owner of the San Francisco 49ers, to hire Joe Thomas as the team's general manager. Davis received a finder's fee, reported to be $150,000. Thomas soon had the 49ers in turmoil before being fired. "All Al wanted to do is undermine his closest competitor," said one league executive. "And he got paid for it."

When Davis was an assistant coach with the old Los Angeles Chargers of the AFL, he convinced Lance Alworth to sign with the team by drawing football diagrams on a table cloth and then pointing to the wide receiver spot before telling him: "This is your position. You can be great. You can catch 10 passes a game." Alworth later found out Davis made the exact same spiel to every player he was trying to sign.

Other than perhaps Cincinnati's Paul Brown, no NFL owner dominates his franchise quite like Davis dominates Oakland.

The Raiders have no general manager, no offensive or defensive coordinator, no membership in a scouting combine. Davis is the Oakland Raiders; his employes for the most part are nameless faces who receive little of the credit for the team's success and certainly little of the blame for its failures.

Nor has anyone else in the NFL gone about maintaining greatness in quite the same way as Davis. He has kept the Raiders a force for the 17 years he has been with the club -- they have the best record of any team in the league over that period -- through a combination of shrewd trades, good drafts and successful gambles on supposedly washed-up players. His closest competitors during that span, Dallas, Los Angeles and Minnesota, have relied almost totally on the draft.

Davis attends practice almost daily, has his own copy of game films and makes regular strategical suggestions. And he has won with a puppet for a coach (John Rauch), with a strong-minded door kicker for a coach (John Madden) and with a calm, single-minded ex-quarterback for a coach (Tom Flores).

In the process, the image of Davis and the Raiders has far exceeded reality.

The image is of an owner who is sinister, devious, mysterious, deceitful, cold, manipulative. The image of the team is dirty, brutal, bullish, offbeat, a bunch of outcasts and rebels just like the boss. That both the team and the owner wear black (and silver) only enhances their uncomplimentary portraits.

The Raiders, in reality, may not be candidates for the Mr. Nice Guy award, but they are far more relaxed and much more open-minded than, for example, the Philadelphia Eagles.

"I had the same image of Oakland as anyone else before I came here," said Bob Chandler, who was acquired from Buffalo in the offseason. "But I soon found out these guys aren't brutes. People have them stereotyped. Everything is low-key and relaxed here. But I also found out that Al Davis makes sure everything -- facilities, travel, accommodations -- is first class. That's why everyone responds to him."

Davis' image is far harder to crack. Davis himself refuses to shed much light on the matter. He says he doesn't know if he agrees with the idea he is a maverick; yet in the next breath, he says he never follows the crowd "and there is a certain group of owners who don't go for that approach."

This much is certain. Davis is a workaholic who doesn't believe in clock-watching for himself or his employes. He is an impulsive, odd-hour phone caller, a lover of politics and fine English literature, a devoted weightlifter and exercise buff.

He also sees only black and white in his relationships; there is no gray area for compromise. He is convinced the Los Angeles controversy has only reinforced his feelings -- that the league and Rozelle are out to do him in. He is feisty, shrewd and very complex. And he is obsessed with the desire to win.

"Just about everything that you hear about Al is completely opposite from the truth," said Madden, who had to win the Super Bowl in 1977 to finally prove he, not Davis, was coaching the Raiders. "He's not sinister. He's a very loyal guy.

"But once these images start, they can't be stopped. Things like watering the grass and putting grease on uniforms, maybe the knocks on those things were justified in the early days of the AFL. But not anymore. Yet now if we have luck with a player like John Matuszak, Al isn't given any credit. iBut look at the praise the Eagles get for what's happened with Claude Humphrey."

Says Wolfe, who has been with Davis on and off the last 18, sometimes stormy year: "He's a fine human being to the people who work for him. But if you mess him up, you get chewed out.He's hard on you, very hard."

And: "You don't sit down with him and talk about fishing in the bayous. He'd tell you to get lost. He isn't a guy you hold an off-the-cuff talk with. His life is football, that's all he really wants to think or talk about."

Dan Arkush, managing editor of Pro Football Weekly, has a unique realtionship with Davis, who was a close friend of Arkush's late father, Arthur. When Pro Football Weekly had financial problems recently, Davis and the Raiders bought 25 percent of the publication, although they have no editorial control. Now the weekly paper walks a tightrope trying to avoid being entangled by Davis' web.

"Talking to Al is like playing a massive mind game," Arkush said. "He seems to work every word to his advantage. He can be outright sincere and genuine, like when my father died. He is the most complex guy I've ever seen.
 
cont.

"You can learn more about football from him in 15 minutes than you could in a lifetime from anyone else. He is a genius about the game. But anyone who can put up with him for a year deserves a medal. You come out after eating a dinner with him and you feel like you've run five miles. He is just a very domineering person. He's no back-slapper, that's for sure.

"I think he has an inferiority complex. To make up for it, he loves to do things in big ways and he loves to project this tough-guy image."

Davis' individualtistic approach is maintained even in his speech and dress.

He has the improbable combination of a rough Brooklyn-Southern accent. He looks like something out of "The Hustler" with his greased-back hair, leather jackets, sun glasses, jewelry and those everpresent black-accented clothes.

Davis, 51, grew up in Brooklyn, the son of affluent parents. He was a sports fanatic who was enamored with Army, the Black Knights of the Hudson, and later made black the dominant color of the Raider uniforms. He chose as his hero New York Yankee General Manager George Weiss, a quiet behind-the-scenes wheeler and dealer.

"I try to keep a low profile," he said. "When I was a kid, the great genius in baseball was George Weiss. Maybe the other kids in my neighborhood admired the players, guys like Dixie Walker, Pee Wee Reese, Joe DiMaggio and all the rest. But Weiss was my hero. He developed a great organization, one that created a dynasty that professional sports will never see again."

Davis attended Wittenberg College and graduated from Syracuse before being named line coach at Adelphi. He later coached at The Citadel and Southern California, where his recruiting led to a two-year probation for the Trojans. He then joined Sid Gillman's staff with the Chargers. A fellow assistant on that staff was Chuck Noll.


Wolfe maintains that Davis still is "10 years ahead of everyone else in this league with his thinking."

He certainly was a major force in creating the NFL as we know it today. During his six-month tenure as commissioner of the AFL, he forced a merger with the NFL by signing eight of the older league's top quarterbacks and other stars. When the leagues merged, Rozelle was named commissioner and Davis was left to lament: "They didn't let me pursue the victory I had won."

Davis, who became the Raiders' head coach in 1963, returned to Oakland in 1966 as managing general partner, along with 16 percent interest in the team. It was a mercurial ascent up the pro football power ladder, and he has been jousting ever since with Rozelle and his fellow NFL owners.

Dominating his private wars is his overwhelming ego. Davis is convinced he has created the best organization in pro football through his own genius. He was instrumental in turning Oakland into a major league sports town by getting a major league stadium built. 'and now that there is resistance to his attempts to move that franchise to Los Angeles, he is responding the only way he knows: with what once was described as "his own of down-in-the-gut dirty in-fighting."

So what if Oakland has supported its team splendidly? So what if the other 27 owners are opposed to the move? Davis believes there will be a future major bidding war for free agents. The untapped riches in Los Angeles will give him the money he will need to keep the Raiders competitive in that skirmish -- and dominant in the league.

"You have to remember that when you talk about Al, the most important thing is that the Raiders are always No. 1 in his mind," said Wolfe. "They are his obsession. Everything else comes second." m

When Harland Svare was coaching the San Diego Chargers, he was certain that the locker room in Oakland was bugged by Davis. Before one game, Svare gave the place a thorough search. He finally looked up at a light bulb overhead and screamed, "Damn you, Al Davis, I know you are listening."

When Davis was told that story, he leaned back in his chair and laughed.

"It wasn't," he said, "in the light bulb."
 
Copyright 1984 The New York Times Company
The New York Times

January 9, 1984, Monday, Late City Final Edition

SECTION: Section C; Page 6, Column 1; Sports Desk

LENGTH: 981 words

HEADLINE: ALZADO'S ADDRESS

BYLINE: By Dave Anderson

BODY:
LOS ANGELES WHEN the Los Angeles Raiders were about to go out for the kickoff yesterday to try to qualify for Super Bowl XVIII, Tom Flores talked to his team, as he always does. But then the Raider coach turned and nodded at Lyle Alzado, who got up from the chair at his locker, strode to the middle of the gray-carpeted locker room and addressed his teammates.

''The talk is over,'' the bearded 6-foot-3-inch, 270- pound defensive end said. ''It's time to play.''

During the week, some of the Seattle Seahawks had described Marcus Allen of the Raiders as ''not half'' the running back that Curt Warner of the Seahawks was and described Howie Long of the Raiders, an all-pro defensive end, as more of a ''talker'' than a player.

''Lyle was very fired up,'' Vann McElroy, the Raiders' free safety, was saying now. ''And he got us fired up.''

''When Lyle talked about how the Seahawks had put down Marcus,'' said Bruce Davis, the Raiders' left tackle, ''you could see Marcus's jaw tighten.''

''When you say something about Marcus or Howie Long,'' Vann McElroy said, ''you're saying it about our team.''

After yesterday's American Conference championship game, Lyle Alzado would not discuss his address. But the explanation was up on the Coliseum scoreboard - Raiders 30, Seahawks 14. And the game had been decided when the Raiders took a 20-0 halftime lead, if not on the opening series when the Raiders' defense, with Lyle Alzado still ablaze, sent a ''message'' to the Seahawks.

''The message was, we came to play,'' Matt Millen, the Raiders' inside left linebacker said. ''We let them know it was going to be a tough game.''



In that opening series under a cloudy sky that seemed a mixture of silver and black, the Raiders played as if they were in a ''streetfight,'' a style created by Al Davis, their managing general genius, a style that the Seahawks somehow had prevented in their two regular-season victories over the A.F.C. Western champions.

''We went after 'em this time,'' was about all that Lyle Alzado would say. ''We wanted to get off the ball and get in their faces.''

Seldom has any defensive unit been so effective in deciding a conference championship. During the first half, the Raiders limited the Seahawks to 16 net yards of offense - 25 rushing, minus 9 passing. Dave Krieg, the Seahawks' quarterback, was sacked three times for a total loss of 21 yards while completing only 3 of 8 passes for only 12 yards while being intercepted twice. On his only pass at the start of the second half, he was intercepted again. His replacement, Jim Zorn, was intercepted twice.

''You can read Krieg just like a bold-face print book,'' said Mike Davis, the Raiders' strong safety who had two of the five interceptions. ''The way he turns to one side when he drops back, it doesn't take a rocket scientist to know he's only going to throw the way his body is facing. If he decides to go the other way, he's got to turn himself around to see his receiver.''

Meanwhile, the Raiders were using redesigned defenses to stop Curt Warner, the rookie halfback who led the A.F.C. in rushing during the 16-game regular season with 1,449 yards, added 99 against the Denver Broncos in the wild-card playoff, and had 113 yards in a 27-20 upset of the Miami Dolphins in a divisional playoff. When the Seahawks stopped the Raiders, 34-21, at the Coliseum during the season, he had 101 yards. But in 11 carries yesterday, he was limited to 26 yards, a 2.4 average.

''He killed us with cutback runs in our two games during the season, so we knew we had to take away those cutback lanes,'' Lyle Alzado said. ''We widened our ends, we brought up our cornerbacks to force the play and we had our linebackers playing more inside and tighter. When we shut down Warner, they had to pass and we shut that down too.''



Meanwhile, the Raider blockers were springing Marcus Allen out of Curt Warner's shadow for a total of 216 yards - 154 on 25 rushes, 62 on seven pass-receptions, including a 3-yard touchdown. When he reported to training camp last summer for his second season, the 1981 Heisman Trophy winner talked about wanting to ''pace myself more,'' which may have been a factor in his relatively disappointing total of 1,014 rushing yards during the 16-game schedule. But he's not pacing himself anymore.

In last week's 38-10 rout of the Pittsburgh Steelers in a division playoff, Marcus Allen galloped for 121 yards. Yesterday he was in full flow, darting across the grass the way water does when a stream has overflowed its banks.

''I don't want to sound conceited,'' Marcus Allen said, ''but if I have a good game, it opens things up for everyone else. Now that other teams are double-covering our tight end, Todd Christensen, that leaves a linebacker on me and a running back should be able to outrun a linebacker. I've had better games, but not in a more important game.''

Now, of course, these Raiders will be playing a still more important game Jan. 22 at Tampa against the Washington Redskins, who rallied for a 37-35 victory over the Raiders early in the season.

''The Redskins are very good defensively, but they're vulnerable,'' Jim Plunkett, the Raider quarterback, said. ''I feel we can move the ball against them. When we lost to them this season, we had a bad first quarter. If we can cut out those mistakes, we'll be all right.''

Against the Redskins, yesterday's orator, Lyle Alzado, might not be quite so emotional. John Riggins, the Redskins' fullback, is his longtime friend.

''John and I came into the league together,'' Lyle Alzado was saying now. ''John's a great back. After the Redskins won the Super Bowl last year, I called him up to congratulate him. I think he's a great back and a great guy.''

As he paused, Lyle Alzado's eyes flashed.

''But if I get a chance,'' he said with a smile, ''I'll tear his head off.''
 
Copyright 1987 Associated Press
All Rights Reserved


The Associated Press

December 1, 1987, Tuesday, PM cycle

SECTION: Sports News

LENGTH: 716 words

BYLINE: By STEVE BAKER, Associated Press Writer

DATELINE: SEATTLE

BODY:
Bo Jackson couldn't remember when he had more fun playing football, but his single-handed destruction of the Seattle Seahawks didn't persuade him to give up hitting home runs for scoring more touchdowns.

"I hadn't thought about it," Jackson said of his career plans after the Los Angeles Raiders routed the Seahawks 37-14 Monday night.

"Why should I think about it? I'm having too much fun," Jackson said outside the Raiders' locker room, sunglasses shading his eyes from the glare of television lights.

Fun, for Jackson, was 221 yards on 18 carries, the 13th best rushing performance in NFL history, in just his fifth game.

The best rushing day belongs to Walter Payton of the Chacago Bears who ran for 275 yards against Minnesota in 1977. O.J. Simpson is second and third at 273 and 250 yards.

Fun, for Jackson, was turning 25 while a national television audience watched the 4-7 Raiders break a seven-game losing streak.

"It was my birthday. I had a great time," Jackson said as he spoiled the day for the 7-4 Seahawks and their normally raucous Kingdome crowd.

Fun was accounting for 43 of the Raiders' 59 yards in a scoring drive that gave Los Angeles a 14-7 lead and helped Jackson atone for a first-quarter fumble that gave the Seahawks their only score of the half.

The most fun was a 91-yard touchdown gallop around left end which propelled him into the tunnel leading to the Seahawks' locker room and propelled the Raiders into a 21-7 lead in the second quarter.

"I saw the defender had the angle so I just threw my head back," said Jackson, who was at least five yards ahead of the Seahawks when he crossed the goal line.

After he emerged from the tunnel, Jackson tossed the football in the air and swung at it with an imaginary bat.

But Jackson wasn't talking baseball after his three touchdowns kept the Seahawks from catching AFC West leader San Diego.

"I can't let them make Bo's decisions for him," Jackson said when asked about the football fans who wanted to see what the 1985 Heisman Trophy winner from Auburn could do with a full season.

"I have to do what I want," said Jackson, who said too much has been made of his description of football as a "hobby" when he announced he would join the Raiders after the Kansas City Royals' baseball season ended.

The Seahawks must play on the road for three of their last four games, including a Sunday game in Pittsburgh. The Raiders are out of playoff contention.

Seattle capitalized quickly on Jackson's fumble, marching 64 yards on a drive capped by Dave Krieg hitting Daryl Turner with a 19-yard touchdown pass.

But the Raiders would score on their next seven possessions.

Marc Wilson hit James Lofton for a 46-yard touchdown for the Raiders' first score and then hit Jackson with a 14-yarder for the second.

Jackson's 91-yard run broke the game open in the second period before Chris Bahr kicked field goals of 23 and 47 yards for a 27-7 halftime lead. The run was the longest in Raiders history and helped him surpass the 200-yard single-game club record Clem Daniels set in 1963.

The Raiders opened the second half in equally commanding form.

Jackson carried Brian Bosworth into the end zone on a 2-yard touchdown run for a 34-7 lead. Bahr's 23-yard field goal upped the margin to 37-7 before Krieg finished the scoring with a 3-yard touchdown pass to tight end Mike Tice.

Jackson said he felt a certain kinship with Bosworth, Seattle's high-profile, $11-million rookie. The two spoke after the game.

"I told Boz he had nothing to hang his head about. A lot of people out there would like to see us two fail.

"But Boz and I think alike," Jackson said. "We're determined to come out on top whatever we do."

Jackson's performance overshadowed some other notable accomplishments.

The Raiders' Marcus Allen had 76 yards on 18 carries to become his franchise's all-time rushing leader with 5,934 yards in six seasons. He broke the old record held by Mark van Eeghen, who rushed for 5,907 yards in eight seasons.

The Raiders' 364 rushing yards was a team record.

Steve Largent of the Seahawks caught two passes for 25 yards to go into second place in NFL history in career receiving yardage with 11,841 yards behind Charlie Joiner's 12,095. He passed Don Maynard, who had 11,834 yards in receiving.
 
Schefter : Michaels

Copyright 1997 The Washington Post
The Washington Post

December 12, 1997, Friday, Final Edition

SECTION: SPORTS; Pg. B12; SPORTS WAVES

LENGTH: 873 words

HEADLINE: This Hit by the Raiders on Michaels Was Unsportsmanlike Conduct

BYLINE: Leonard Shapiro, Washington Post Staff Writer

BODY:
The news release with an Oakland Raiders letterhead came via fax last week, and at first glance, it seemed to be a cruel practical joke, worthy only of crumpling and a pitch into the nearest garbage pail.

On second glance, however, it was the real thing, sent out by the Raiders' "public relations" department. The team, which usually means owner Al Davis, was not at all happy with the criticism leveled at the organization by ABC play-by-play announcer Al Michaels during a Nov. 24 Monday night game against the Denver Broncos.

On a night the now 4-10 Raiders were embarrassed by the Broncos, 31-3, Michaels questioned the Raiders' claim to be "the Team of the Decade" and took exception to their continued use of the slogans "Pride and Poise" and "Commitment to Excellence."

Playing off Davis's frequently uttered "Just Win, Baby" motto, Michaels changed that to "Just Litigate, Baby," a reference to the Raiders' court battles with the NFL over the years. When ABC cameras panned up to Davis's box during the game, Michaels said, "He could star in 'The Howard Hughes Story.' "

No question there was tough talk from the boys in the booth that night about the recent swoon by one of the league's most successful teams. But it was hardly out of line or out of context, or particularly malicious, considering the Raiders' poor recent history.

But the Raiders-Davis obviously didn't see it that way, and put out a news release that said, "Michaels doesn't have an ounce of truthfullness or morality in his body. Michaels should confess about his own lack of truthfullness and morality in dealing with fans over the last several years."

But that wasn't the worst of it. The release made a vague reference to a hoax reported by the Rocky Mountain News newspaper in Denver. It involved a bogus request made by one of those dumb and dumber radio stations asking, in a letter, that Michaels and broadcast partner Frank Gifford make obscene promotional sound bites for the station. The Raiders release did not mention that Michaels and Gifford did not pay the letter any heed.

Instead, the release said Michaels was angered by the letter and "proceeded to take out his frustrations and hostilities by scorching the Raiders." It went on to say that Michaels became "further agitated when Oakland Raider owner Al Davis refused Mr. Michaels' advances made prior to the game during pregame warm-ups."

In the interest of fairness and decency, we'll spare you some of the more gory details in the release, in particular the salacious subject matter of those fake promos. Suffice to say, the inclusion of that malicious information in a press release sent out to a number of media organizations by an NFL franchise was an outrageously irresponsible act, no matter what Michaels had said on the air.

Al LoCasale, Davis's long-time executive assistant and spokesman, insisted he had no idea who wrote the release, but essentially said that the organization was not going to apologize for sending it out.

"I haven't seen Mr. Michaels apologize for what I consider to be the poorest display of unprofessional conduct I've ever seen on an NFL telecast," he said.

Asked if Davis had written the release himself, LoCasale said, "Al doesn't type."

"I don't write press releases," Davis said in a telephone interview last night. "The genesis is, the way I understand it, this guy [Michaels] took three hours of prime time in a premeditated attempt to knock the hell out of the Oakland Raiders. . . . My only approach on this is that Al Michaels was out of line."

It's not the first problem between the two. Davis was furious five years ago with an interview Michaels did with then-Raiders running back Marcus Allen. Allen was highly critical of the organization in general, and Davis in particular, and was frustrated at not being granted his wish to be traded.

Davis was asked by ABC to respond to Allen's charges, but he declined. LoCasale said yesterday it was his understanding the Allen interview was taped on a Thursday before the game, and Davis wasn't asked to respond until Monday afternoon.

He also criticized Michaels for bringing up on the air Nov. 24 Denver Coach Mike Shanahan's contention that the Raiders had not paid him the full value of his contract after he was fired as the team's head coach four games into the 1988 season. LoCasale said that when the Raiders wanted to settle the issue in court (after Commissioner Paul Tagliabue ruled in Shanahan's favor), Shanahan dropped the case.

"Why didn't Al Michaels get that right?" LoCasale said. No question, if Michaels got the Shanahan issue wrong, he ought to go on the air and correct the mistake.

Asked last week about the Raiders-Broncos broadcast, Michaels told USA Today, "It's very important to be honest with the fans."

ABC spokesman Mark Mandel said yesterday that Michaels would make no further comment on the Raiders' news release.

"We're just shocked," Mandel said, "that the Raiders would make such a personal, inflammatory attack on Al Michaels, who I would say has impeccable journalistic credibility."

I would say so, too. At least far more than a patently irresponsible news release sent out by the Oakland Raiders.
 
;) .....................

Copyright 1995 The Chronicle Publishing Co.
The San Francisco Chronicle

View Related Topics

OCTOBER 21, 1995, SATURDAY, FINAL EDITION

SECTION: SPORTS; Pg. E1

LENGTH: 730 words

HEADLINE: At Age 40, Vince Evans Has Endured
QB stays in 'great shape'

BYLINE: Ron Kroichick, Chronicle Staff Writer

DATELINE: El Segundo

BODY:
Nolan Harrison was only eight or nine at the time, long before he grew into a full-sized, NFL defensive end. His father took him to Soldier Field to see their hometown team, the Chicago Bears -- and a dynamic, young quarterback.

His name was Vince Evans.

''I'll never forget it,'' Harrison said. ''We weren't used to seeing black quarterbacks in the league, period. But I had never seen a quarterback like this. He was running all over the place.

''I was like, 'Daddy, is he a running back?' . . . For a guy I idolized growing up, playing with him now is really cool.''

Evans has spanned generations, as he sheepishly acknowledged. At age 40, he is the oldest active player in the NFL. (Rams tackle Jackie Slater, 41, is injured.) Evans will fill a vital role for the Raiders tomorrow, when he replaces injured starter Jeff Hostetler against Indianapolis.

Harrison's frame of reference is common among Raiders players: They often mention their fathers when talking about Evans. As running back Harvey Williams said, ''My dad is maybe five years older than him -- and my dad doesn't look anything like Vince Evans.''

Wide receiver Tim Brown came across Evans' football card a few weeks ago, from his rookie sea son with the Bears. Brown laughed as he recalled how different Evans looked, with a ''big Afro'' haircut.

''I'm amazed when some of the guys tell me how old they are,'' Evans said. ''I don't think of myself as an old guy. I'm competing just like everybody else, but it makes you stop and think how long my tenure's been.''

His tenure began with a phone call from Bill Tobin one night in the spring of 1977. The NFL draft lasted two days back then; Tobin, Chicago's director of scouting at the time, called Evans after the first day was done.

The Bears had the first choice the next day. Tobin told Evans, who played at USC, that the Bears were interested in him. Evans said he wanted to stay in California and would not play in Chicago. Tobin and Bears general manager Jim Finks thought about it -- and drafted Evans, anyway.

Thus started the odyssey that took him from the Bears to the USFL to one year out of football to the Raiders. Now, more than 18 years after arriving in Chicago, Evans still wears the uniform every Sunday, including tomorrow's 1 p.m. game against the Indianapolis Colts at the Coliseum.

Tobin, coincidentally, is vice president/director of football operations for Indianapolis. He will attend tomorrow's game, and he knows one big reason Evans will line up at quarterback.

''Vince keeps himself in great shape,'' Tobin said. ''He's always been very fitness-conscious.''

Evans also learned to control his expectations. He started 32 games in his seven years with the Bears, including all 16 games in 1981. But Evans evolved into the prototype veteran backup, wise enough not to complain.

This start will be Evans' first since Oct. 3, 1993. Before that, he had not started a real NFL game in 10 years (he started three replacement games during the 1987 strike).

''Everybody's got an ego in this league,'' Evans said. ''Once you recognize where you stand, then you're not second-guessing yourself. It doesn't mean I haven't thought about being the guy. I work my butt off to be that guy.

''At the same time, you never know as a backup when that opportunity is going to present itself. I can't afford to have a bad attitude.''

Evans never became a longtime starter for many reasons. In Chicago, as he recalled, the offense featured Walter Payton. Then he bolted for the USFL. Then the Raiders always seemed to find starters elsewhere.

Raiders players marvel at Evans' physical condition. He routinely out-runs teammates barely more than half his age. He takes on all challengers in locker-room wrestling matches, including giant defensive tackle Chester McGlockton.

His teammates clearly own great respect for Evans.

''He's probably the leader on the team, anyway,'' Brown said. ''People look up to him. He leads the prayer before the game. Pretty much every big deal that happens on this team goes through Vince.

''Now he's just taking on a little bit more responsibility.''
 
Copyright 1988 Associated Press
All Rights Reserved


The Associated Press

February 29, 1988, Monday, AM cycle

SECTION: Sports News

LENGTH: 945 words

BYLINE: By JOHN NADEL, AP Sports Writer

DATELINE: LOS ANGELES

BODY:
Mike Shanahan, who's been trying to beat the Los Angeles Raiders the last four years, was introduced as the club's head coach Monday and said his immediate goal is to help the team win another championship.

"It's going to be a privilege to me to keep up the tradition of a Tom Flores, a John Madden, and an Al Davis, that kind of tradition and the championships that were won here," Shanahan said at a news conference. "I know these goals can be achieved.

"My concern is not really with the playoffs because my standards are higher than getting into the playoffs. Our standards are to win world championships. It's been a situation of great tradition and great success. I'm going to try and add to that success."

The Raiders are the only AFC team to win a Super Bowl in the 1980s, having accomplished the feat following the 1980 and 1983 seasons. But the club has missed the playoffs the last two years, going 8-8 and 5-10, respectively.

The Broncos, aided by offensive coordinator Shanahan, won the AFC West championship the last two years and advanced to the Super Bowl, while the Raiders finished well down in the standings.

The Raiders' record last year was their poorest since 1962. Flores announced his retirement as head coach on Jan. 20 at the age of 50 after nine years on the job. His teams were 83-53 in regular-season games.

Flores had succeeded Madden, whose teams were 103-32-7 in 10 years and won the Super Bowl following the 1976 season.

"It's indeed a great honor and a privilege to be the head coach of the Los Angeles Raiders," Shanahan said, adding that he signed a three-year contract to coach the team. "It's always been a goal of mine to be a head coach in the National Football League; to be the head coach of the most successful team in professional sports history makes it that much better."

Shanahan, who at age 35 becomes the youngest head coach in the NFL, was an assistant under Dan Reeves at Denver the past four seasons and served as the Broncos' offensive coordinator for the last three.

Shanahan is credited with tailoring Denver's offense to fit the talents of quarterback John Elway, an offense which probably was more responsible than anything for getting the team to the last two Super Bowls.

"As I went into his character, as I went into his background, I found no flaw," said Davis, the Raiders' owner, in introducting Shanahan. "His record speaks for itself. His vast amount of experience for a young man is unequaled by many."

Davis characterized Shanahan as "bright, enthusiastic, and with a love of and for the game of football," and called the hiring "a new chapter in Raider history."

Davis said he first interviewed Shanahan the night after the Broncos were beaten 42-10 by Washington in the Super Bowl on Jan. 31. Davis said he spoke several times with Shanahan and with a total of six people about the job.

"I started looking into him in 1984," Davis said of Shanahan. "Just like we watch all the great players who come into the league, we watch all the young coaches who come into the league.

"His record while at Denver is synonymous with greatness. You have to respect what's been going on in Denver the last few years. We certainly respect it. I was looking for an excellent coach. I was looking for someone who I thought could bring greatness to the Raiders.

"He has been close to almost everything the Raiders do in the last four years other than living with us. He's had to play the Raiders, but he certainly knows Denver."

Not only is Shanahan the youngest coach in the NFL, he is the youngest coach hired by a team in the league since the Broncos hired Reeves at 37 in 1981. Shanahan will be a head coach for the first time, as were Madden and Flores when they were hired by Davis.

"I've always been asked a lot of things about my age," Shanahan said. "It comes down to one thing, you've got to get the job done. I think of my age as a plus, but you've got to get the job done, and I intend to do that."

A native of Oak Park, Ill., Shanahan played quarterback at Eastern Illinois, graduating from that school in 1974 and earning a master's degree there the following year.

He then spent two years as backfield and receivers coach at Oklahoma. Following one-year stints as an assistant coach at Northern Arizona, Eastern Illinois and Minnesota, he was hired by Florida as its offensive coordinator. After four years at Florida, he went to the Broncos.

Shanahan said he plans to bring Denver assistant Alex Gibbs along with him to the Raiders as a special assistant. Most of the Raiders' assistant coaches will be retained _ five were released shortly after Flores retired. Davis said there were two vacancies, at most, to be filled.

"I take a look at a team's defense," Shanahan said. "I really thought the Raiders were one of the best-coached defenses in the National Football League. We felt in Denver that the one thing we had to do to be successful was beat the Raiders. Offensively, I haven't really studied them.

"Obviously, my expertise is in the offensive area. I plan to contribute in a lot of areas. Our quarterback situation will start at the base. I will not have a preference as to which one will play. There are several people at that position who I will look at."

The Raiders have had quarterback problems in recent years, with veterans Marc Wilson and Jim Plunkett and the young Rusty Hilger unable to provide them with any consistency at the position.

"I'm going to be my own person and try to do the best job I can," Shanahan said. "I have the freedom to do the things I want to do offensively. You try to go full speed ahead, make decisions, don't look back."
 
Copyright 1989 U.P.I.


United Press International

October 3, 1989, Tuesday, BC cycle

SECTION: Sports News

LENGTH: 752 words

HEADLINE: Shanahan fired by Raiders

BYLINE: By JEFF HASEN, UPI Sports Writer

DATELINE: LOS ANGELES

BODY:
Hall of Fame lineman Art Shell became the NFL's first black head coach in more than 60 years Tuesday, replacing Mike Shanahan of the Los Angeles Raiders after the team lost three of its first four games.

''It is a historic event and I understand the significance of it,'' Shell said at a news conference. ''The main thing is I know who I am and I'm proud of it.

''But I'm also a Raider. I don't believe the color of my skin entered into this decision. If you know Al Davis or this organization, you'll understand that.''

Shell, who was offensive line coach since 1983, made the Pro Bowl eight times as a Raider offensive tackle. He joined the team's coaching staff after retiring seven seasons ago and was thought to be among those considered before Shanahan was given the job.

By hiring Shell, 42, the Raiders remove a stigma that has long blemished the NFL. For years, the league has trailed baseball and basketball in minority hiring and been repeatedly criticized by civil rights groups for its failure to name a black head coach from its ranks of qualified assistants.

The last black head coach in the NFL was Fritz Pollard, who coached the Hammond (Ind.) Pros in the mid-1920s.

Baseball has had four black managers since Jackie Robinson broke the sport's racial barrier in 1947. Two of them -- Frank Robinson of Baltimore and Cito Gaston of Toronto -- had their teams contending for the American League East title on the final weekend.

The most prominent black in baseball's executive suite is Bill White, president of the National League.

Minority hiring is no longer an issue in the NBA, where six blacks were head coaches last year and two black businessmen recently bought the Denver Nuggets.

Shell said he has not discussed contract with Davis.

''I have no problem with that,'' he said. ''When I was a player, I'd go into his office and we'd talk contract for five minutes about other things for 30 minutes.''

Shanahan, who refused comment before leaving the Raiders' facility in El Segundo in early afternoon, guided the Raiders to an 7-9 record last year in his first season as an NFL head coach. He had a three-year contract.

The Raiders have blown two fourth-quarter leads and fell behind 28-0 to Denver in another game. Los Angeles is last in both rushing yards allowed (653) and penalty yards commd (307). The team has also been called for 11 holding penalties in the last two games.

Los Angeles, which has made nine moves at linebacker since the season began, plays the New York Jets next Monday night at the Meadowlands. A Raider loss would give the franchise its worst start since 1964.

Shanahan, 37, was the offensive coordinator of the AFC West-rival Denver Broncos when Davis hired him in February of 1988.

''I wouldn't admit a mistake even if I made one,'' Davis said when asked if he erred in hiring Shanahan.
''This is not done in anyway to downgrade anyone else. When I hired Michael, I thought our organization needed a fresh implementation of ideas to go along with what we were doing. I felt what was happening was we were going not in the direction of addition, but of total change.''

Davis' three previous coaches since 1966 when he returned to the Oakland Raiders as managing general partner were John Rauch (1966-68), John Madden (1969-78) and Tom Flores (1979-87). Flores resigned after the 1987 season amid rumors that Davis was pushing him out.

''I've never had in my experience to fire a head coach,'' Davis said. ''I'm sensitive to my head coach it's the toughest job in America, possibly to the President of the United States. You are dealing with the lives of people and under the microscope every day.''


Shanahan began the season looking over his shoulder after the Raiders failed to make the playoffs last season. Davis was upset the team was not throwing deep to Willie Gault and Mervyn Fernandez.

Training camp was marred by the traffic death of safety Stacey Toran. Matt Millen and Todd Christensen, links to the team's glory days in Oakland, were waived, and running back Marcus Allen held out.

The team was also distracted by the near-daily stories on the expected move of the franchise from the Coliseum to Oakland or Sacramento.

''My direction will be that we have to regain our identity,'' said Shell, who will ask all of Shanahan's assistants to stay. ''One of power, explosion and simplicity.

''We don't care if you know where we are on the field. We know where you are, too. We want to give the players the opportunity to win.''
 
Copyright 1980 U.P.I.


United Press International

November 12, 1980, Wednesday, AM cycle

SECTION: Sports News

LENGTH: 224 words

DATELINE: SACRAMENTO, Calif.

BODY:
If the Oakland Raiders move to Los Angeles next season and want to keep their ''Raiders'' name, they may have to give a Beverly Hills attorney a couple of seats on the 50-yard line.

Attorney Allen Neiman owns first rights to the corporate titles ''Los Angeles Raiders'' and ''California Raiders.'' He registered the names with the secretary of state for a $4 fee and no one can legally use the names without his permission.

Neiman says he's willing to transfer the names to the Raiders, but he doesn't want money. He wants seats for himself and partner Jerry Billet.

In a letter to Raiders managing general partner Al Davis, the lawyer wrote that the two seat-seekers were ''confident'' they could arrange for the football team to use the Raider name.

''It is not money we seek,'' Neiman wrote. ''While it would be inconvenient to change to the names of our corporations, I am sure this inconvenience will be eased if we are in a position on Sunday afternoons to watch the victorious Raiders from a position midway between the goal posts (rows 25-40).''

Neiman said he and Billet have been supporters of the Los Angeles Rams for 30 years, ''only to be cast aside and deserted like ex-wives'' when the Rams moved to Anaheim this season.

The Raiders' proposed move to the Los Angeles has been mired in a lengthy legal battle.
 
Copyright 1981 U.P.I.


United Press International

May 20, 1981, Wednesday, PM cycle

SECTION: Sports News

LENGTH: 883 words

HEADLINE: Opening arguments begin in Raiders trial

BYLINE: By RICH TOSCHES, UPI Sports Writer

DATELINE: LOS ANGELES

BODY:
Defense attorneys, comparing the game of football to a piece of pottery, began their opening arguments Wednesday in the $213 million antitrust suit pitting the Oakland Raiders and the Los Angeles Coliseum against the NFL and the Los Angeles Rams.

Patrick Lynch, representing the NFL, took about two hours for his arguments and hammered away at the most important issue in the case that could result in a landmark decision in professional sports -- whether or not the NFL is a single entity or is composed of 28 individual units.

Using a 20-by-15 foot chart that blocked the view of most spectators in the crowded courtroom, Lynch repeatedly told the jury the league was a single organization and insisted it would dissolve into chaos if it were governed by the individual teams instead of the league itself and its commissioner.

Lynch exhibited several cartoons of a pottery maker to illustrate how one man would make a product and another would sell it.

''These are agreements between the men to market the product,'' he told the jurors. ''They are working together to sell the product and they are working as a single unit.

''That's what the NFL is. All 28 teams in agreement to produce a certain product.

''If any of the teams drops out of the production, like the Oakland Raiders want to do, the product becomes different.''

In the first day of opening arguments Tuesday, Raiders' attorney Joseph Alioto accused Rams owner Georgia Frontiere of placing ''excited telephone calls'' to NFL Commissioner Pete Rozelle, pleading with him to block the Raiders' planned move to Los Angeles.

The NFL, which stopped the move by citing a league rule requiring approval of three-fourths of the franchise owners, is accused of conspiring with the Rams to prevent the Raiders' relocation.

''She told Mr. Rozelle,'' Alioto said, 'Please keep the Raiders out (of Los Angeles) because we can't stand the competition.'

''Mr. Rozelle told her not to worry.''

Rozelle and Raiders Owner Al Davis -- bitter enemies at best -- listened intently to the opening arguments, but both smiled frequently, and occasionally laughed at the humorous delivery of Coliseum attorney Maxwell Blecher.

Both men, along with Mrs. Frontiere, also attended Wednesday's session. The Rams attorneys were scheduled to deliver their opening arguments later in the day.

Davis and Rozelle sat on opposite sides of the courtroom, and they didn't look at each other or communicate during the proceedings. When leaving the courtroom, both appeared to make a point of not crossing each other's paths.

''It was refreshing for me to hear the case recapped,'' Davis said. ''Today was like our past season. We have great coaches and players going for us in this trial. And I hope we come out the winners at the end.''

Rozelle said that he heard nothing unexpected Tuesday, but he was anxious to get his side of the story told.

''We want to get our version out,'' Rozelle said. ''Some of today's business was misleading, but that was expected. I'm sure after tomorrow their attorneys will think we were misleading, also.''

After two hours of jury instructions by U.S. District Judge Harry Pregerson, Blecher argued that the rule protecting teams' territorial rights is illegal.

Blecher used testimony from Rozelle's predecessor, NFL Commissioner Burt Bell, to show that Rule 4.3 violates the Sherman Antitrust Act. Blecher displayed testimony given by Bell in a Senate hearing in 1958, when he said the rule was designed to protect the territorial rights of the 12 clubs then in the NFL and to prevent another team from moving to a city that already had a team.

''That rule eliminates competition,'' Blecher said, ''and that is a gross violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act. Elimination of competition was the sole reason for the design of that rule.''

The Coliseum first filed suit against the NFL in September, 1978. The Raiders joined in the suit early in 1979 and also named the Rams as a defendant. The Coliseum and Raiders are seeking the $213 million in damages from the league and the Rams.

Blecher told the seven-woman, three-man jury that during the trial, expected to last three or four months, three issues will be ''repeated over and over.''

''First, the Los Angeles Coliseum, in the heart of what will be the nation's largest city by the end of this century, has no major-league football tenant,'' Blecher said.

''Secondly, the Coliseum and Raiders signed an agreement that would bring the Raiders to Los Angeles.

''And third, the Coliseum remains empty today because the NFL will not let a team play there.''

A key issue in the trial will be the jury's determination of whether the NFL is a single entity composed of 28 ''members,'' or consists of 28 seperate business groups, the teams, acting independently of each other.

''They call themselves partners,'' Blecher said, ''and that is simply ridiculous.

''As partners, why don't they share their profits? Sure, they share television revenues, but what about the rest of their profits?

''Not only don't the teams share their wealth, they refuse to even tell each other how much money they make each season. And you call that a partnership?''

Gene Upshaw, a veteran Raiders lineman, attended the session as ''a curious onlooker. Nothing more.''
 
Copyright 1981 The New York Times Company
The New York Times

June 21, 1981, Sunday, Late City Final Edition

SECTION: Section 5; Page 5, Column 3; Sports Desk

LENGTH: 946 words

HEADLINE: DAVIS DOMINATES N.F.L. TRIAL

BYLINE: By Robert Lindsey

DATELINE: LOS ANGELES, June 20

BODY:
Al Davis, managing general partner of the Oakland Raiders, ended more than six days as a witness in his antitrust suit against the National Football League this week, and as he did, Federal District Judge Harry Pregerson, who is hearing the case, waved a friendly goodbye to him and said:

"Sort of hate to see you leave."

Davis had given an interesting performance on the witness stand, the kind that his team, which has won two of the last five Super Bowls, are known for-tough, combative, uncompromising and sprinkled with enough drama to keep spectators fixed in their seats.

For the moment, many people who have been sitting through the trial agreed, Davis seemed agead on points. But, as Davis, whose teams have a flair for pulling out games in the final minutes, would probably agree, with six weeks of trial to go, its too soon to pick a winner in an intensly competitive contest that could determine much of the economic future of professional football.

Raiders, Coliseum Are Suing

The Raiders, along with the Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum Commission, are suing the N.F.L. because the league refused to allow the Oakland team to move to the coliseum after the Los Angelel Rams moved to suburban Anaheim two years ago and vacated it.

Davis and the coliseum commission claim that a league rule requiring the approval of 21 of the 28 teams in the league to move to a new stadium violates the Sherman Antitrust Act by allowing team owners to restrict competition among themselves and in effect, operate an illegal cartel.

In its defense, the league argues that team owners are partners, not competitors, and like any partnership they have a right to set the terms of how they operate, including determining where N.F.L teams play.

Besides the antitrust allegation, the Raiders have sued the league for allegedly violating an oral agreement Davis claims he got from the league that permitted him to move the team to Los Angeles-an agreement that Commissioner Pete Rozelle of the N.F.L. says was never made.

The Raiders have also accused Rozelle and two owners, Georgia Rosenbloom Frontiere of the Rams and Eugene Klein, of the San Diego Chargers, of participating in all illegal conspiracy to block the Raiders' move to Los Angeles so that they could protect their teams' economic interests.

The trial is taking place in the Federal District Courthouse here before 10 jurors who answered a 30-page questionnaire designed to assure that they knew virtually nothing about football, and who are now being asked to decide sophisticated, often arcane issues of antitrust law argued by some of the best antitrust lawyers in the country.

Each day the spectator section is filled. Looking tanned and confident, Rozelle sits in the front pew on one side of the courtroom, Davis, in the front row on the other side, Mrs. Frontiere attends daily, and frequently other team owners, such as Art Modell of the Cleveland Browns; Tex Schramm of the Dallas Cowboys, and Joe Robbie of the Miami Dolphins, attend.

High stakes are involved, not only for professional football-where a verdict against the N.F.L. could result in damages of more than $150 million - but other professional sports as well.

Davis' legal assault is aimed at the economic heart of pro sports: He is attacking the process under which a handful of owners in a professional league now control competition among themselves through agreements that give owners in almost all cities a monopoly through a variety of self-policing procedures.

On Monday, the trial will enter its seventh week; lawyers on both sides expect to continue into August. After that, the losing side is expected to begin an appeal process that could take years.

After finishing his testimony, Davis was heard to tell an acquaintence, with apparent pride, "We're dominating the trial." If anything, Davis himself dominated the last week or so of the trial.

Apparantly adapting a best-defense-is-a-good-offense philosophy from the gridiron, Davis seemed to score points effectively under examination by his own lawyer, Joseph L. Alioto, and counter-attacked aggressively during cross examination by Patrick Lynch, a lawyer for the N.F.L.

"That's not true, Nr. Lynch, that's not true at all," he said several times. "Let's get it straight, Mr. Lynch," he said at another juncture, "That's ridiculous, Mr. Lynch," another time.

No, he insisted, he had not demanded that officials here give him $1.4 million for a new house if he agreed to move the Raiders to Los Angeles; no, he said, he did not want to come here simply because it offered a potentially huge pay-television audience of sports fans.

His desire to move from Oakland, he acknowledged, was motivated by money - the Super Bowl-winning Raiders would have made at least $4 million more in Los Angeles than Oakland last year, he said. It was not greed that motivated him, he said, but a realization that in the 1980's professional football would become increasingly like an escalating international "arms race," with teams being forced to pay more and more for players and coaches, and unless the Raiders had a larger economic base here to support the competitive war, they would become a second-rate team.

The league will begin its defense next week, and has said that it may produce 50 or more witnesses to support its contention that the team owners operate lawfully as a partnership.
 
Copyright 1981 The New York Times Company
The New York Times

August 15, 1981, Saturday, Late City Final Edition

SECTION: Section 1; Page 17, Column 2; Sports Desk

LENGTH: 1102 words

HEADLINE: DAVIS LABELS ONE HOLDOUT JUROR A 'PLANT'

BYLINE: Special to the New York Times

DATELINE: LOS ANGELES, Aug. 14

BODY:
Al Davis, the chief executive of the Oakland Raiders, vowed today to continue his effort to move the team to Los Angeles, and he accused the National Football League of having placed a ''plant'' in the jury so as to obtain the mistrial that was declared late last night in the Raiders' antitrust suit against the league.

Judge Harry Pregerson of United States District Court announced the mistrial after the jurors, split 8 to 2 in favor of the Raiders, had told him that they were unable to reach a verdict. A new trial was scheduled for Sept. 21.

''I'm a tough guy,'' Davis said at a news conference today. ''I'm candid, and I say what I think, and I'm determined to pursue what's right,'' he said in declaring his intention to win at a second trial on the antitrust issue.

Concerning one of the jurors, Thomas Gelker, who was believed to have been the main holdout in favor of the league, Davis said: ''It was an obstruction of justice, a plant. But I accept that as the normal course of things. I don't get upset. That's the law of the jungle when you're fighting against the N.F.L.''

Alioto to Seek Inquiry

Joseph L. Alioto, Davis's lawyer, asserted that N.F.L. security agents had improperly tried to contact at least four jurors, and he announced that he would ask the United States Attorney's office here to determine if Mr. Gelker - who, jurors said today, was steadfast in support of the league during 13 days of deliberations - was guilty of obstruction of justice.

''He lied his way on to the jury,'' Mr. Alioto asserted. Mr. Gelker had said in examination of prospective jurors that he had no connections with professional football but admitted after deliberations had begun that his first cousin had owned the Portland franchise in the now-defunct World Football League. Mr. Gelker was criticized by several other jurors today for what they characterized as a dislike for Davis and ''preconceived ideas'' about the case.

Neither Davis nor his lawyer offered evidence at today's news conference to support their charges. Mr. Gelker told The Los Angeles Herald-Examiner: ''I've been accused of being for the N.F.L. win, lose or draw, but that's an erroneous statement. I merely tried to get some viewpoints across.''

The league's commissioner, Pete Rozelle, scoffed at the allegations at a news conference of his own later in the day. ''Regarding the plant, that's just totally untrue,'' the commissioner said. ''Al says a lot of things.''

High stakes are riding on the legal confrontration, especially for the league. And its close call with the deadlocked 8-to-2 jury, some observers said here, may prompt the league to seek an out-of-court settlement that would allow the Raiders to come to Los Angeles, rather than have the N.F.L. face another trial on the antitrust issue.

In their suit, Davis and the Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum Commission are seeking $160 million in damages against the league and its 27 other teams. But the stakes go beyond money.

The suit has challenged the foundation upon which the league operates as one of professional sports' most exclusive clubs, a club in which a few team owners allocate territories among themselves, set their own rules and keep others from playing in the league or sharing its lucrative income from the television networks.

The case was given to the jury two weeks ago after 55 days of testimony and after often bitter infighting between Davis and Rozelle.

The confrontation was rooted in an effort, announced by Davis in 1979, to move the Raiders to the Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum. Such a move would have filled a vacuum that was made certain when Carroll Rosenbloom, then the owner of the Rams, announced late in 1978 that his team would leave Los Angeles for nearby Anaheim beginning with the 1980 season.

After months of dissension over the issue, league clubowners rejected Davis's proposal to move, saying that it would be unfair to the fans in Oakland who had loyally supported the team for more than 20 years. That rejection came at the league meetings of March 1980 by a vote of 22 teams to none, with five of the N.F.L.'s 28 clubs abstaining and with the Raiders forced to be absent.

Davis reacted by saying that he was moving to Los Angeles whether the other owners wanted him to or not, and he accused Rozelle of trying to protect what he characterized as a monopoly held in the Los Angeles area by Georgia Rosenbloom Frontiere, Rosenbloom's widow, who had inherited the team from her husband.

The league responded by going to court in a vain effort to have the team placed in receivership, and the City of Oakland tried uncessfully to get ownership of the team through eminent domain condemnation proceedings.

Davis counterattacked and joined a lawsuit filed previously by the Memorial Coliseum Commission that claimed the league, in preventing the Raiders' move to Los Angeles, was in violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act.

League Constitution at Issue

Davis and the Coliseum Commission charged that section 4.3 of the league's constitution, which requires the approval of 21 of the 28 teams in the league to transfer a franchise, was unlawful because it allowed owners to restrain trade to protect their own economic position.

The league responded that teams, while they compete on the playing field, do not compete economically. It argued that the league consisted of 28 partners who were ''a single business entity.''

During the trial, Judge Pregerson ruled that there was no evidence to back accusations of a conspiracy by Mrs. Frontiere and Rozelle. But, in a major victory for Davis and the Coliseum Commission, he held that the league was not a partnership but a group of competitors who come under the Sherman Act.

Members of the jury told reporters today that they had been deadlocked 8-2 since the second day of deliberations, and several of them criticized Mr. Gelker, who they asserted had taken a position in favor of the league soon after deliberations had begun and expressed a knowledge of football he had denied having during questioning by the judge before the trial began.

''He wouldn't even look at the evidence,'' Omar White, one member of the jury, asserted. ''I believe if they can get an unbiased jury that Al Davis will be able to move.''
 
Copyright 1982 U.P.I.


United Press International

March 23, 1982, Tuesday, BC cycle

SECTION: Sports News

LENGTH: 352 words

DATELINE: LOS ANGELES

BODY:
An anonymous woman made a series of phone calls Monday alleging that a prospective juror in the NFL-Oakland Raiders antitrust suit had discussed the case with his family and was concealing a prejudice against the NFL.

What effect the three calls might have on jury selection was not immediately clear, but federal Judge Harry Pregerson said prospective jurors already questioned would be called Tuesday and asked ''appropriate questions.''

The calls were placed to Pregerson's chambers, the Anaheim headquarters of the Los Angeles Rams and the law offices of O'Melveny & Meyers, a Los Angeles law firm representing the NFL.

In the first call, the caller identified herself as a relative of a male juror who had discussed the case with his family over the weekend.

In the second call, the woman said she was the mother of a juror and suggested the judge question prospective jurors further because her son ''is a football fan and wants the Raiders to come down here.''

And in the third call the woman said a member of her family would be on the jury and had already made up his mind he wanted the Raiders in Los Angeles.

''I have a feeling that we're probably dealing with a crank caller and will never get to the bottom of this,'' Pregerson said in court.

Raiders attorney Joseph Alioto seemed to agree.

''There are two events that tend to bring out the nuthouse brigade,'' he said. ''One is a full moon and the other is a major trial.''

Twenty-two prospective jurors had been placed in a so-called safe pool through the first six days of jury selection, meaning they had been questioned and no one had challenged them on grounds of clearly shown prejudice.

The plan has been been to get 28 people in this pool and then let each side eliminate 10, leaving a panel of six jurors and two alternates.

The first trial of the case ended last Augsut in a hung jury. Ten jurors were on the panel and eight sided with the Los Angeles Commission and Raiders, who contended the NFL unreasonably restrained trade by refusing to allow the Oakland team to move to Los Angeles to play in the Coliseum.
 
Copyright 1982 The New York Times Company
The New York Times

March 27, 1982, Saturday, Late City Final Edition

SECTION: Section 1; Page 21, Column 1; Sports Desk

LENGTH: 918 words

HEADLINE: DAVIS'S LOVE OF N.F.L IS BEING TESTED;
Davis Says Trial Tests His Love of the N.F.L.

BYLINE: By GERALD ESKENAZI, Special to the New York Times

DATELINE: PHOENIX, March 26

BODY:
Al Davis, the managing general partner of the Oakland Raiders, today left not for home, but for Los Angeles, after the National Football League meetings ended Thursday.

Davis was moving on to the latest round in the legal battle by the Raiders against the league. The retrial of his Federal antitrust suit will resume in Los Angeles on Monday, when the league will again defend itself against charges that it had illegally conspired to keep the Raiders from moving to Los Angeles Coliseum.

Davis was jaunty as the meetings were ending, and as usual, he was the gadfly. When the coaches were reminded that they work for management and should not side with the players in the current labor dispute, Davis was the only person in the room who argued that the coaches should be neutral.

Some Teasing for Rooney

On his way to the swimming pool, Davis spotted the 81-year-old owner of the Pittsburgh Steelers, Art Rooney, who was slowly walking away.

''Hey, Art! Walk with your head up,'' Davis shouted, alluding to the Steelers' 8-8 record last season. ''You had one bad year.'' Still shouting, Davis said, ''I remember 1972. You came down to the locker room and congratulated me. 'What are you doing that for?' I told you. 'You won.' ''

Rooney chuckled at the memory of how he had left his private box in Three Rivers Stadium in Pittsburgh with the Steelers losing in the final minutes and how he had discovered when he got to the locker room that the Steelers had won when Franco Harris made a stooping catch of a pass deflected by a defender and scored a touchdown.

''Whatever happened to that coach you had who used to go crazy on the sidelines?'' said Rooney. ''Oh, him,'' Davis said. ''He's a spy for us now.''

Love That Needs More Space

Davis moved poolside, where he dispatched his chief factotum, Skipper McNally, to order a hamburger.''I love football. I love the N.F.L.,'' said Davis. ''But there's no way they can relegate me to a stadium that's one of the smallest in the N.F.L. No parking, no concessions, no boxes. I saw what they did to Finley there, and they're not going to do it to me.'' He was referring to Charles O. Finley, the former owner of the Oakland A's.

Now the thoughts were tumbling out of Davis in a stream of consciousness, so unlike the way he has managed the Raiders, and they turned to the past and present ownership of the New York Jets.

''Four years ago, Leon Hess came to me after Phil Iselin died and said, 'I want you to come home. Sell your interest in the Raiders. I'll give you 25 percent of the Jets if you run them,' '' Davis said.

Why, Davis was asked, had he turned down Hess? ''My life's in Oakland,'' he said. Hess, the principal owner of the Jets, was traveling and could not be reached to confirm Davis's recall of a discussion after the death of Iselin, the Jets' president. Mrs. Helen Dillon, who owns 25 percent of the club, said, ''I'm shocked,'' when told of Davis's statement. She said she was not aware that Davis had been offered the deal.

Davis eventually tried to move his team out of Oakland. At first, Davis and the N.F.L. commissioner, Pete Rozelle, maintained a polite distance between themselves and often discussed each other in diplomatic terms.

Rozelle-Davis War of Words

At this week's meetings, though, the niceties vanished. Rozelle accused Davis of ''cherry-picking'' the rules, implying that he was picking the ones he liked. ''I didn't see an Oakland hand voting against the TV package,'' said Rozelle, referring to the $2 billion contract for N.F.L. games with ABC, CBS and NBC.

''Pete is sneaky as usual,'' said Davis when told of Rozelle's statement. ''I'm not averse to following the rules as long as they're not in violation of the Constitution of the United States.''

''A rule is not illegal until it is tested in court, and he's testing this one,'' Rozelle said. Davis joked with Gil Brandt, the vice president of personnel development for the Dallas Cowboys, who was strolling near the pool. ''See, it's not me against the N.F.L. I love the N.F.L. I get along with most of the other owners,'' Davis said.

Effect on Raiders Felt

Another owner walked by and said, ''Hello, Al.'' Davis grunted. ''Now, you noticed I didn't say, 'Hi, how ya doin'. I don't get along with him. I'm not going to give him a big hello,'' Davis said. ''What's disturbed me about all this is my football team. I missed four months, day and night, with the trial - May, June, July, August.''

For the first time since 1964, the Raiders, who had won the Super Bowl the previous season, had a losing record. They finished at 7-9. ''There were only two times in my life that I didn't give myself to my work,'' said Davis. ''When my wife got sick - she's really come back - and this trial.''

With Davis gone, his aide, McNally, said, ''He's the most cubic man I know. He's got four dimensions. The average man has three.'' And Rooney, asked about Davis, said, ''I told him, 'Al, you've got everything. You're from Brooklyn. You won a championship. Al, what more do you want?' ''
 
Copyright 1982 U.P.I.


United Press International

May 8, 1982, Saturday, BC cycle

SECTION: Sports News

LENGTH: 426 words

DATELINE: OAKLAND

BODY:
The city of Oakland went into mourning when it learned that its beloved Raiders will probably be headed for Los Angeles.

When word came that Al Davis had won his suit against the National Football League for the right to move the team, Nellie Ozen wept.

''I always got too emotional about the games,'' she said. ''I would run with the halfbacks and block with the tackles. So now I'm all emotional again. I feel real bad.''

She and other fans at Uppy's, a hangout for the Raider diehards, said that even though the verdict would be appealed, they felt the team would eventually be gone.

Losing the Raiders would not only be hard on the city's morale, it would also be an economic blow to the city.

''I'll tell you what the Raiders mean to Oakland,'' said Scott Summerfield of the Chamber of Commerce. ''We figure it means $36 million a year in direct revenue and $180 million a year in indirect revenue,'' which he said included money spent in bars, restaurants, hotels, advertising and the airport.

''For the city, it's like losing an industry. And having the team snatched out from under the city is also a tremendous emotional blow to Oakland,'' Summerfield added.

Mitch Hoffman, owner of the Sir Loin Restaurant, said, ''The Raiders mean an awful lot to this town. With both the Raiders and A's here, we have a fantastic city. Now what have we got?''

Hoffman had mixed emotions because he is a personal friend of Davis.

''I wish to heck he'd stay in town,'' said Hoffman, ''but I symphathize with him. Oakland has been pretty mean to Al. The Oakland Coliseum people thought they had him. They thought he had no place else to go. They were out to get him.''

Former Oakland city manager David Self, who has acted as the city's attorney in efforts to keep the team, is trying to convince the California Supreme Court that the city has the right to acquire the team through eminant domain.

He said of Friday's decision, ''I don't know what went through the minds of the jury, but it would be very difficult to excise all of the pro-Los Angeles feeling from a jury selected from the Los Angeles area. What would a San Francisco jury decide if it were faced with a choice of losing the 49ers?''

Said Oakland policeman Ed Davidson, who often had duty on game day at the Coliseum, ''I've watched the people out in the parking lots before and after the games. I've seen the vans and the mobile homes and the parties. These people deserved a better deal.''

Ozen was a little harsher.

''I hope Al Davis dies and goes to hell,'' she said.
 
Copyright 1982 U.P.I.


United Press International

May 8, 1982, Saturday, PM cycle

SECTION: Sports News

LENGTH: 817 words

HEADLINE: Raiders Win Antitrust Suit

BYLINE: By RICH TOSCHES, UPI Sports Writer

DATELINE: LOS ANGELES

BODY:
It took 76 days of testimony in two trials and millions of dollars in attorneys' fees. But in the end, it took an all-woman jury just 5 hours to rule the National Football League violated federal antitrust laws by refusing to allow the Oakland Raiders to move to the Los Angeles Coliseum.

During closing arguments, an NFL attorney said the league's ability to prevent teams from moving from one city to another, ''...is our backbone. We depend entirely on fan loyalty and civic pride. That's our livelihood. If teams decide they can pick up and move whenever they'd like, the NFL will be in serious trouble.''

The NFL's ability to block all team moves was contained in Rule 4.3 of its constitution which requires approval from three-fourths of the team owners for a franchise relocation. But Friday's verdict said the NFL's use of the rule in blocking the Raiders' move to Los Angeles was a violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act.

Contrary to the complaints from the NFL, Davis said the league won't suffer because of the verdict.

''I'm elated. I knew it would happen, but it's no less exciting,'' Davis said. ''We won it on credibility and the facts. For 15 years we've known that rule was illegal, and knocking it down like this won't hurt the NFL one bit. We'll still be a great league, but now our laws will conform to the laws of the United States.

NFL attorneys said they would appeal the decision.

''The jury was not given a clear indication of how the antitrust laws should apply to this industry,'' said a grim-faced Patrick Lynch, the NFL's chief attorney. ''I think they probably did the best they could with the kind of instructions they were given. I think we have a good chance on appeal.''

Asked if the fact that the jury was all women had an affect on the outcome, Lynch said, ''I don't say it was because they were women. It was because we had to consistently exclude sports fans from the jury.''

Raiders' attorney Joseph L. Alioto said the verdict would serve as a solid barrier against an appeal.

''It was a smashing victory over a very tough and worthy opponent,'' Alioto said. ''We hope to be here (in Los Angeles) for the 1982 season. We're going to move ahead rapidly with the intent of getting the team to Los Angeles as soon as possible.

''This overwhelming victory should carry us through any remaining problems.''

The Raiders filed a request for an injunction immediately following the verdict that would prohibit the NFL from enforcing Rule 4.3 and clear the Raiders' path to Los Angeles for the 1982-83 season.

''We want the judge to enjoin the operation of that rule,'' Alioto said, ''and if he does it gives us the opportunity to sit down with the Los Angeles Coliseum Commission and make a business arrangement that will take us to the Coliseum this year.''

The huge 100,000-seat stadium in downtown Los Angeles -- the nation's third-largest city -- was left without a pro football tenant when the Rams moved to suburban Anaheim in Orange County two years ago.

Coliseum attorney Maxwell Blecher said the quick return of a verdict came as no surprise.

''I think the toughest thing the jury had to do was pick a foreman,'' he said. ''The NFL had no case. It wasn't even close.''

NFL Commissioner Pete Rozelle said, ''Our immediate concern is the effect this verdict will have on the basic structure and stability of the National Football League. It could cause a serious erosion in the competitive balance that makes sports entertaining.''

In contrast to the first trial, which ended last August after 12 days of deliberations with the jury hung at 8-2 against the NFL, forewoman Patricia Hollowell announced the verdict after only 5 hours of deliberation.

U.S. District Court Judge Harry Pregerson ordered the jury to return to court Sept. 20 to begin the damage phase of the trial. The Raiders have asked for $213 million in damages but indicated they would settle for much less.

Davis said he never wanted the issue to be forced to trial, but made it clear he wasn't about to forgive Rozelle, his bitter opponent ever since Davis announced his desire to move the team.

''What bothered me most is that it became a personal thing with Mr. Rozelle,'' Davis said. ''I don't like the way he handled this one bit. There were too many dirty tricks. He finally admitted the real reason behind this whole thing -- he wanted Los Angeles for himself.

''He finally said it was the best city in the country to have a team and he wasn't about to let me have it. I think we showed Mr. Rozelle that he can't treat people like that. He can't push people around like that.''

Despite the long and bitter battle that Davis waged to move to Los Angeles, Ray Ward, manager of the Oakland Coliseum, said Oakland would still pursue the Raiders.

''We expect them to talk to us as well as the Los Angeles Coliseum,'' Ward said. ''After all, they're businessmen.''
 
Copyright 1982 The New York Times Company
The New York Times

August 3, 1982, Tuesday, Late City Final Edition

SECTION: Section D; Page 19, Column 1; Sports Desk

LENGTH: 1268 words

HEADLINE: A SEASON OF ROAD GAMES

BYLINE: By MALCOLM MORAN, Special to the New York Times

DATELINE: SANTA ROSA, Calif.

BODY:
For all the legal arguments that have gone on in Los Angeles, and all the barroom discussions and fan protests throughout the Bay Area and the political maneuvering in Oakland, it took John Matuszak, the 6-foot-8-inch defensive lineman, to put his team's question of identity into perspective.

Matuszak sat in front of a television camera last week, dressed completely in Raider black, as technicians made their adjustments. To check their sound levels, they asked Matuszak to say a few words.

''L.A. Raiders, winning a championship,'' Matuszak said. He paused. The technicians needed a few more words. ''L.A. or Oakland Raiders, winning a championship,'' Matuszak said. ''I'll tell you this. I won't know what's happening until I line up and they say, 'Play ball.' ''

The players, coaches and fans are preparing for a most unfamiliar autumn mixed with the familiarity of their training camp routine. The most secure of the Raiders will find themselves in the same position as the newest rookie. At the end of camp, barring what would be a surprise legal reversal, there will be a new place to play and live.

The organization will provide hotel rooms for the players who cannot overcome the southern California real-estate market. For those with families and homes near Oakland, this could be a season of 16 road games. ''Being a bachelor for the whole season,'' said Tom Flores, the head coach, whose family will stay behind. His two sons are in college, but his wife, Barbara, and his daughter, Kim, will stay while Kim finishes high school.

''There's a certain amount of time when you should enjoy being with your family instead of being alone,'' Flores said. ''It's going to be a problem.''

The most loyal boosters now admit that the football traditions that have grown for more than 20 years are being taken elsewhere. For emphasis, there was the picture in a recent Oakland Tribune, showing a moving van as it was emptied in Los Angeles. The sign on its side, next to the familiar logo with the patched eye and crossed swords, said ''Los Angeles Raiders.''

''You ever hear about the Brinks stickup?'' said Sammy Stein, a patron at the Ringside, a downtown bar. ''That's the way I feel. The guy came in with a pair of old overalls and took the team.''

He was talking about Al Davis, the club's managing general partner, the subject of several uncomplimentary editorial cartoons that one booster club plans to reprint on billboards in Oakland and Los Angeles.

There are still bumper stickers from the times when the fans fought to keep the team. The stickers read ''Go Oakland Raiders,'' but the word ''Go'' is crossed out and replaced by the word ''Stay.'' Now, the newest stickers call them the Oakland Traitors.

''So it's all over,'' said Eddie Butler, an owner of the Ringside. A Raider helmet hangs on a canopy over his bar, and Raider memorabilia fill the walls. But two years ago, at the first hint of a Raider move, Mr. Butler canceled his season ticket. At first, he said he did not want to discuss the subject. Soon he was shouting and pounding a fist on his padded bar.

Concedes Business Reasoning

''I don't want to read about it no more,'' Mr. Butler said. ''I don't want to hear about it no more. Let 'em go. We don't need 'em. We had nothing once before. Maybe we'll get something better.''

At the King's X, a restaurant that once sent as many as four busloads of fans to Raider games, there is a stained-glass window, traced back to 1910, that promotes the old Brooklyn Steam Beer company from the Brooklyn District of Oakland.

Just as another generation of fans in another Brooklyn was outraged by Walter O'Malley's move of a profitable Dodger franchise to Los Angeles in 1958, the Raider fans speak of Davis.

''I can see his business reasons for doing it,'' said Lou Raposa, sitting at the bar at the King's X. ''As a businessman, I think he's a great businessman. As a person, I think he's a Grade A jerk. If I had stock in the Raiders, I think I'd see things his way.''

Symbol of City's Pride

The problem, said Bob Seward, another King's X regular, is that the Raiders became a symbol of the city's pride, something to counter the superiority complex of the people on the other side of the bay. As the Raiders grew from the orphans taken into tiny Frank Youell Field into champions playing before weekly sellouts of more than 50,000 at the Coliseum, their followers grew with them.

''It isn't show business,'' Mr. Seward said. ''It isn't just another pro football thing. I took this thing personally. People said, 'You're overreacting.' They said it's like Barnum and Bailey going to its permanent winter residence. ... People say: 'That's show biz. We'll get another act next week.' I don't think it is.''

The players are caught in the middle. They have no more to do with the move than the fans, and yet the players cannot expect a friendly welcome back to the Bay Area when the Raiders open both the exhibition season and the regular season at San Francisco's Candlestick Park, against the 49ers.

Jim Plunkett, the quarterback whose ties to the area go back to his days at Stanford, said he does not have any objections. ''One of the reasons I wanted to get out of New England was because I wanted to come home to the Bay Area,'' Plunkett said. ''But I'm not going to be playing too much longer. I don't mind. It should be fun. I think if we stayed in Oakland, it would be kind of a hostile environment, especially if things didn't go well.''

Boon to Film Ambitions

Mickey Marvin, an offensive guard, owns a home in North Carolina with his wife, a former Raider cheerleader, and he has rented another in Oakland. With their furniture in storage, they are now looking for a place in Huntington Beach, south of Los Angeles. ''There's no way I'm going to live in a hotel for four months and leave her up here,'' Marvin said.

Then there is Matuszak, who has a unique identity. ''I'm from Paramount,'' he said. He has appeared in several movies, and refers to acting as ''my future career.''

Matuszak's new home will not hurt that career. ''How many national commercials have you seen that's had a Raider, ever?'' Matuszak said. ''You've seen one. You saw Ken Stabler throw a can of Bardahl oil. That's going to change in L.A.''

For Randy Pryor, a 15-year-old fan, there is a different perspective. His bedroom in Galt, Calif., is covered with bits of Raider history in the form of posters, pictures and newspaper clippings. He has watched them for as long as he can remember, and the time before that has been filled in by reading books and programs. He said he has written two letters to Davis, neither of which has been answered.

''I don't think he has any idea of what the Raiders mean to people like me,'' he said. ''When football season came, that was all I did.'' After Davis first announced his intentions to move the team, Randy Pryor tried to change his feelings. ''I'd say to myself, 'I hate them,' but it was impossible,'' he said. '' I couldn't stay away from them. I was fooling myself. I couldn't just turn my back. I'm still going to watch them when they go to L.A.

''There's nothing like Raider football, even if it is on TV. I'm bitter. But there's nothing I can do about it. I wish there was.''
 
At Age 40, Vince Evans Has Endured
QB stays in 'great shape'

Nolan Harrison was only eight or nine at the time, long before he grew into a full-sized, NFL defensive end. His father took him to Soldier Field to see their hometown team, the Chicago Bears -- and a dynamic, young quarterback.

His name was Vince Evans.

''I'll never forget it,'' Harrison said. ''We weren't used to seeing black quarterbacks in the league, period. But I had never seen a quarterback like this. He was running all over the place.

''I was like, 'Daddy, is he a running back?' . . . For a guy I idolized growing up, playing with him now is really cool.''

Evans has spanned generations, as he sheepishly acknowledged. At age 40, he is the oldest active player in the NFL. (Rams tackle Jackie Slater, 41, is injured.) Evans will fill a vital role for the Raiders tomorrow, when he replaces injured starter Jeff Hostetler against Indianapolis.

Harrison's frame of reference is common among Raiders players: They often mention their fathers when talking about Evans. As running back Harvey Williams said, ''My dad is maybe five years older than him -- and my dad doesn't look anything like Vince Evans.''

Wide receiver Tim Brown came across Evans' football card a few weeks ago, from his rookie sea son with the Bears. Brown laughed as he recalled how different Evans looked, with a ''big Afro'' haircut.

''I'm amazed when some of the guys tell me how old they are,'' Evans said. ''I don't think of myself as an old guy. I'm competing just like everybody else, but it makes you stop and think how long my tenure's been.''

His tenure began with a phone call from Bill Tobin one night in the spring of 1977. The NFL draft lasted two days back then; Tobin, Chicago's director of scouting at the time, called Evans after the first day was done.

The Bears had the first choice the next day. Tobin told Evans, who played at USC, that the Bears were interested in him. Evans said he wanted to stay in California and would not play in Chicago. Tobin and Bears general manager Jim Finks thought about it -- and drafted Evans, anyway.

Thus started the odyssey that took him from the Bears to the USFL to one year out of football to the Raiders. Now, more than 18 years after arriving in Chicago, Evans still wears the uniform every Sunday, including tomorrow's 1 p.m. game against the Indianapolis Colts at the Coliseum.

Tobin, coincidentally, is vice president/director of football operations for Indianapolis. He will attend tomorrow's game, and he knows one big reason Evans will line up at quarterback.

''Vince keeps himself in great shape,'' Tobin said. ''He's always been very fitness-conscious.''

Evans also learned to control his expectations. He started 32 games in his seven years with the Bears, including all 16 games in 1981. But Evans evolved into the prototype veteran backup, wise enough not to complain.

This start will be Evans' first since Oct. 3, 1993. Before that, he had not started a real NFL game in 10 years (he started three replacement games during the 1987 strike).

''Everybody's got an ego in this league,'' Evans said. ''Once you recognize where you stand, then you're not second-guessing yourself. It doesn't mean I haven't thought about being the guy. I work my butt off to be that guy.

''At the same time, you never know as a backup when that opportunity is going to present itself. I can't afford to have a bad attitude.''

Evans never became a longtime starter for many reasons. In Chicago, as he recalled, the offense featured Walter Payton. Then he bolted for the USFL. Then the Raiders always seemed to find starters elsewhere.

Raiders players marvel at Evans' physical condition. He routinely out-runs teammates barely more than half his age. He takes on all challengers in locker-room wrestling matches, including giant defensive tackle Chester McGlockton.

His teammates clearly own great respect for Evans.

''He's probably the leader on the team, anyway,'' Brown said. ''People look up to him. He leads the prayer before the game. Pretty much every big deal that happens on this team goes through Vince.

''Now he's just taking on a little bit more responsibility.''


The forum should just be shut down right now because there will never be anything better than what donovan just posted... In fact, all of y'all should be standing in line waiting to give donovan long wet tongue kisses in appreciation for spreading the message of the Church of Vince...


ALL HAIL THE GREAT VINCE EVANS!!
 
Heh... I thought you might like that one. There were a couple other Vince Evans features that were good reads; I'll try to post them, too.

Don't mean to badger anyone with all the articles. It's mostly just for my entertainment, anyway, I suppose, but I'll consolidate them to this thread.

As a younger Raiders fan, I missed out on a lot of this stuff and I've never seen any video or audio accounts of these things so it's been awesome to step in the time machine with this. I'll just add on as I go so I–or anyone else ;) – can read or re-read when convenient.
 
Back
Top