R4Life
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 8, 2006
- Messages
- 1,962
- Reaction score
- 31
Done, done and I'm on to the next one...
Culpepper vs. McCown: Now what?
Posted by Jerry McDonald - NFL Writer on Tuesday at 4:43 pm
Josh McCown remarked last week that when it came time for Lane Kiffin to choose his starting quarterback, at least this time the coach would have a body of regular-season work on which to base his decision.
Culpepper was the fan favorite from the outset. He had a Pro Bowl past in Minnesota and some huge statistical seasons. He had better stats in preseason, and it wasn't a popular decision when Kiffin chose McCown based on his knowledge of the system.
That much was obvious when McCown began getting booed in the season opener. The pro-Culpepper sentiment increased when McCown was awful in a 23-20 overtime to Denver after limited practice time during the week because of a foot injury.
When McCown broke his toe just before halftime against Cleveland, Culpepper came in to thunderous cheers, finished off a win over the Browns and then had his trimphant return to Miami.
Since then, the offense under Culpepper has produced two touchdowns, a field goal, 13 punts and three interceptions in division losses to San Diego and Kansas City.
McCown's log before being injured? Twenty-nine possessions, eight punts, five touchdowns, eight field goal attempts, five interceptions and two fumbles.
As shaky as Culpepper has been the last two games, the guess here is McCown being restored as the starter would be hugely unpopular. I can only imagine how loud the boos would have been Sunday if McCown had been the quarterback with the Raiders trailing the Chiefs 6-0.
With Culpepper, it was more of a restless displeasure.
It's clear at this point the Culpepper is not the same guy who Warren Sapp called the "white rhino" when Culpepper was at Minnesota. (The white rhino designation had to do with Culpepper's size and power for his position and the fact that white rhinos are extremely rare).
The three rushing touchdowns against Miami created an illusion. Culpepper no longer brutalizes would-be tacklers for rushing gains or bounces off them for pass completions. With the Vikings, before his knee injury in 2005, Culpepper rushed for 400 or more yards six times, with a high of 609.
It was a huge part of Culpepper's game. He was able to create off broken plays for big runs or big pass plays.
Now the man who averaged 30.6 yards per game rushing before his injury is averaging 5.9 yards per game on the ground since his surgeries. Kiffin and Greg Knapp are attempting to reform him in efficient, mistake-free quarterback.
Culpepper has been an extremely popular teammate and a classy guy from the day he arrived, acting without any sense of entitlement or expectations. But on the field, he is not likely to be the old Daunte any time soon, and certainly not by the time his one-year contract expires with the Raiders.
McCown, on the other hand, never fully seized the job the Raiders wanted him to have since Day 1. Like Culpepper, McCown acts and carries himself like a respected starter, but through 2 1/2 games was too prone to turnovers and erratic passes.
It's Kiffin's job to choose which one of these players has what it takes to return the Raiders to respectability. It's not any easier of a call now than it was when the season started.
There are already calls from fans and media for JaMarcus Russell, but put yourself in Kiffin's place. Do you concede six games into the season that the offense you've been putting in since minicamps is an abject failure and that you're willing to go with a quarterback who missed all of training camp?
Assuming Kiffin is not going to throw Russell into the fray this soon, and that Andrew Walter's time came and went last year, Culpepper and McCown are your choices for the immediate future.
Here is one painful thought: the first quarterback the Raiders courted to be their starter this season was Jeff Garcia, who wasn't interested in coming to a team which was drafting its quarterback of the future.
Garcia has yet to throw a single interception with the Tampa Bay Buccaneers. No assurances he would have done that in Oakland, of course, but what would the Raiders record be if their starting quarterback had no interceptions?
Culpepper vs. McCown: Now what?
Posted by Jerry McDonald - NFL Writer on Tuesday at 4:43 pm
Josh McCown remarked last week that when it came time for Lane Kiffin to choose his starting quarterback, at least this time the coach would have a body of regular-season work on which to base his decision.
Culpepper was the fan favorite from the outset. He had a Pro Bowl past in Minnesota and some huge statistical seasons. He had better stats in preseason, and it wasn't a popular decision when Kiffin chose McCown based on his knowledge of the system.
That much was obvious when McCown began getting booed in the season opener. The pro-Culpepper sentiment increased when McCown was awful in a 23-20 overtime to Denver after limited practice time during the week because of a foot injury.
When McCown broke his toe just before halftime against Cleveland, Culpepper came in to thunderous cheers, finished off a win over the Browns and then had his trimphant return to Miami.
Since then, the offense under Culpepper has produced two touchdowns, a field goal, 13 punts and three interceptions in division losses to San Diego and Kansas City.
McCown's log before being injured? Twenty-nine possessions, eight punts, five touchdowns, eight field goal attempts, five interceptions and two fumbles.
As shaky as Culpepper has been the last two games, the guess here is McCown being restored as the starter would be hugely unpopular. I can only imagine how loud the boos would have been Sunday if McCown had been the quarterback with the Raiders trailing the Chiefs 6-0.
With Culpepper, it was more of a restless displeasure.
It's clear at this point the Culpepper is not the same guy who Warren Sapp called the "white rhino" when Culpepper was at Minnesota. (The white rhino designation had to do with Culpepper's size and power for his position and the fact that white rhinos are extremely rare).
The three rushing touchdowns against Miami created an illusion. Culpepper no longer brutalizes would-be tacklers for rushing gains or bounces off them for pass completions. With the Vikings, before his knee injury in 2005, Culpepper rushed for 400 or more yards six times, with a high of 609.
It was a huge part of Culpepper's game. He was able to create off broken plays for big runs or big pass plays.
Now the man who averaged 30.6 yards per game rushing before his injury is averaging 5.9 yards per game on the ground since his surgeries. Kiffin and Greg Knapp are attempting to reform him in efficient, mistake-free quarterback.
Culpepper has been an extremely popular teammate and a classy guy from the day he arrived, acting without any sense of entitlement or expectations. But on the field, he is not likely to be the old Daunte any time soon, and certainly not by the time his one-year contract expires with the Raiders.
McCown, on the other hand, never fully seized the job the Raiders wanted him to have since Day 1. Like Culpepper, McCown acts and carries himself like a respected starter, but through 2 1/2 games was too prone to turnovers and erratic passes.
It's Kiffin's job to choose which one of these players has what it takes to return the Raiders to respectability. It's not any easier of a call now than it was when the season started.
There are already calls from fans and media for JaMarcus Russell, but put yourself in Kiffin's place. Do you concede six games into the season that the offense you've been putting in since minicamps is an abject failure and that you're willing to go with a quarterback who missed all of training camp?
Assuming Kiffin is not going to throw Russell into the fray this soon, and that Andrew Walter's time came and went last year, Culpepper and McCown are your choices for the immediate future.
Here is one painful thought: the first quarterback the Raiders courted to be their starter this season was Jeff Garcia, who wasn't interested in coming to a team which was drafting its quarterback of the future.
Garcia has yet to throw a single interception with the Tampa Bay Buccaneers. No assurances he would have done that in Oakland, of course, but what would the Raiders record be if their starting quarterback had no interceptions?
Last edited: