There’s truth to that, especially as to FA, where there should be less guess work. As to the draft, many things affect performance versus expectations: concensus view, actual talent, mental ability to adapt/convert from college game to NFL, coaching, scheme fit overtime, etc. Because of all the variables, I don’t put bad drafting just on the GM. It’s one reason why I think it’s okay to judge a draft class based on information then-available, even after the draft.
For example, the RB debate does not depend on performance. It’s a low value position group regardless.
Bech was a reach even had he performed better. That he didn’t is the downside of trading down, picking for need.
SpyGuy ended up with two extra comp 3rds, which was a plus regardless of spend. He then spent the picks on the OL—ending position runs at both OT and OG. To me, he played that well. I’m optimistic about both picks.
I’m goofy for measurables, so Porter in the 3rd and Thornton in the 4th worked for me. Hemingway was a reach but apparently fit what the D wanted and Pegues was a Day 3 steal (for whatever that’s worth). Missing on 6th and 7th round picks is immaterial.
This year, I doubt 10 rookies make the team even if they all play well. We already have a young team. I’d rather end up with 8 better players. That’s going to affect my overall view of the class.