General NFL News Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
Chris_77 said:
but you were correlating it to Adams high target/low percentage performance. Plus I already forward slashed the thread so any further commenting is void.
Click to expand...
you can’t triple slash a double slash Lloyd
Awkward Jim Carrey GIF
 
Darkenblot said:
We have been over the targeting myth before.

Adams was targeted 180 times in 2022 and 175 in 2023. Similar to some other All-Pro WRs.

www.pro-football-reference.com

2024 NFL Receiving | Pro-Football-Reference.com

Check out the 2024 NFL Receiving Stats and more on Pro-football-reference.com
www.pro-football-reference.com www.pro-football-reference.com

A good chunk of the top receivers last year had catch percentages in the 60s, including studs like Jefferson and Lamb. Star WRs tend to get balls that wouldn't be risked to lesser talents because they are that good.

Larry Fitzgerald's career rate was 61% and he had a season during his prime with a 45% rate. I guess he sucked that year or he had horrible QB play. It was the latter.
Click to expand...
Your boy friend force fed him the ball the first two possessions of every game.

Everyone knew where the ball was going.
 

Nevada Supreme Court denies NFL rehearing in Jon Gruden case​


By Bob Harkins
Oct. 2, 2025 9:16 pm EDT

Jon Gruden’s lawsuit against the NFL could be heading to a public trial after the Nevada Supreme Court denied the league’s latest attempt to avoid that Thursday.

The NFL sought a rehearing on an August decision that denied a motion to send the case into the league’s arbitration process instead of through the courts. Thursday’s unanimous decision, announced in a one-page document that said “rehearing denied” and was signed by all seven justices, ended that attempt.

It is unclear if the NFL will appeal the decision to the U.S. Supreme Court. An NFL spokesperson declined to comment when reached Thursday night.

Gruden’s lawyer, Adam Hosmer-Henner, said, “We’re obviously pleased with the Court’s decision.”

Thursday’s ruling comes less than two months after the Nevada Supreme Court denied a motion by the NFL to send the case into arbitration. In a statement in the wake of that decision, the court said the NFL Constitution’s arbitration clause “does not apply to Gruden” because he was a former employee at the time his lawsuit was filed, calling its use in this case “unconscionable.”

The NFL appealed that ruling on Sept. 8 and asked for a rehearing, arguing that the court made “several errors that threaten arbitration agreements across a host of industries. Its decision respectfully warrants rehearing.”

Gruden sued the NFL and Goodell in November 2021 after he resigned as coach of the Las Vegas Raiders, a decision he made after racist, homophobic and sexist emails emerged from an investigation into the NFL’s franchise in Washington. In his suit, Gruden accused the NFL of leaking those emails “through a malicious and orchestrated campaign,” saying “the NFL and Commissioner Roger Goodell sought to destroy the career and reputation of Jon Gruden, the former head coach of the Las Vegas Raiders.”

Gruden alleged in the complaint that he was “forced to resign” in the wake of those emails becoming public.

Gruden sent the emails in question while he worked as a “Monday Night Football” commentator at ESPN from 2011 to 2018; they were sent to Washington’s president at the time, Bruce Allen. More than 650,000 Allen emails were reviewed as part of the league’s investigation into sexual harassment and workplace culture in Washington.
 
Crow said:

Shots fired.
Click to expand...
He got fucked his 2nd year big time.

Pats literally didn’t have an OC on their staff his 2nd year. Talk about sophomore slump…

I can hear Bill now. “Go do that stuff that Tom used to do. Run your own offense kid”
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top