Jerry McDonald's blog
Walter confirms your suspicions
Posted by Jerry McDonald - NFL Writer on Sunday at 8:22 pm
OAKLAND _ It appears you guys know a little about football.
At least that’s the way it sounded when Andrew Walter took the podium after the Raiders lost 17-13 to the Denver Broncos Sunday.
Speaking in his usual monotone, Walter took the podium and was brutally honest about the offensive system which has seen him accumulate 44 sacks and get off to a staggering start to what he hopes is a successful career as an NFL quarterback.
Before getting to Walter, a few points should be made:
1) The game was there for the taking. Walter had a few chances to hit passes which could have put the game away and he didn’t do it. He acknowledged this.
2) Walter fumbled the ball away the last two times Oakland had the ball. He took the blame for that as well.
Things actually went well in the first half. Walter completed 12 of 20 passes for 135 yards, and Oakland had a 13-7 lead that could have been 17-7 had he put a little loft under a pass toward Alvis Whitted in the end zone on third-and-1 from the 2-yard line late in the half.
He completed passes to nine different receivers and had 10 intended targets.
Walter threw a 21-yard screen pass to LaMont Jordan. Colleagues in the press box tell me there have been one or two others this season, although not executed that well. I can’t remember them.
There was a 21-yard swing pass to Justin Fargas, a play which also helped put the onrushing Broncos on their heels and a seldom seen pass.
The Raiders lined up tight end John Madsen as a fullback, then sent him into the deep flat for a 25-yard gain, a bit creativity that was stunning considering what we’ve seen so far this year.
Running backs (including Madsen on his play) caught 5 passes for 76 yards in the first half after not catching more than four passes in a single game in the first half of the season.
Then it all came apart. The Raiders were shut out in the second half, Jake Plummer made a few plays, and the Broncos did enough to win even though Oakland’s defense again deserved better.
How could this suddenly contemporary looking offense fall so flat? Walter had his theories, and wasn’t afraid to share them. They are the same things much of the media, as well as fans and many of you posters below, have been saying since the day Tom Walsh was hired by Art Shell as offensive coordiantor.
Some of the highlights:
– Why the Raiders struggle in the fourth quarter: “One of the reasons is we don’t have a lot of depth as far as our playbook goes.'’
– On what happened in the second half: “When you go through and exhaust all your plays like those quick hitters, you call them all and the second time around they make their adjustments. Obviously, that’s the way it’s been a lot this year.'’
– On the lack of a “bread and butter'’ reliable play to go to: “Earlier in the season, it was sort of our running game. I think we’ve gotten away from that the last couple of games a little bit. But bread and butter? I can’t say that we do.'’
– The lack of use of wide receiver Ronald Curry: “He only comes in when we use three wide receivers. Any time we can get him on the field, I think he’s a playmaker and we can utilize him. I certainly like the way he runs routes, the way he sees things. I like to get the ball to him, and if we can get him out there more, I think it would be helpful for us.'’
The inability to audibilize to a good play: “We have our chance to work on it during the week, but it’s hard to audible to a play you haven’t run or that we don’t have in the game plan. You kind of keep with what you have. You can’t audible to a particular play you might have run back in camp, or that you don’t have in. You have your plays and you have your audibles, and you really can’t audible to one of your plays because there’s not enough time at the line of scrimmage and you basically end up verbalizing what you’re going to do at the line of scrimmage anyway.'’
–On how Walter’s ideas are received in meetings with Walsh about his preferences: “Some acceptance, some rejection. I would like there to be, I say it quite often, more quick stuff, more swing routes, flat routes, short stuff. You can’t keep taking five steps and seven steps. We didn’t do a lot of seven-step (today), but you can’t keep doing that. We have to move the pocket. We did a little bit and had success with it and we should have more of that stuff. Again, I have to play better, but there are certain things I like to see as well.'’
When asked directly if the offense was too predictable, Walter said, “I think that would be a true statement. Absolutely.'’
Additonal observations from Sunday’s loss:
– By the letter of the law, Chris Carr conceded he probably deserved the “unsportsmanlike conduct'’ penalty for not returning to the field immediately following a Shane Lechler punt.’
Stuart Schweigert had recovered a Kevin Kircus fumble at the 20, with Kirk Morrison forcing the fumble. It came back because Carr, forced out of bounds by Curome Cox and Dominique Foxworth, didn’t get back on the field fast enough, although he did return to the field.
It was a huge call. Instead of Oakland ball at the 20, Denver took over at the 40 after Lechler punted again and drove 60 yards for a score. The Raiders were envisioning a 20-7 lead at best or 16-7 at worst and then they were down 14-13.
I agree with Jarrod Cooper’s assessment of it being a “very, very, very ticky-tack call.'’
– Randy Moss . . . one catch, eight yards. He dropped another one, although it was a low pass and it wasn’t a big deal because it wasn’t going anywhere. Moss was the target of just five passes. Walter threw eight times to Randal Williams and seven times to Alvis Whitted.
Williams had five catches for 61 yards after never catching more than three balls in a single game in his six-year career.
Jerry Porter was a non-factor. Couldn’t have been on the field for more than four plays and had zero passes thrown his way.
– Warren Sapp, who had two more sacks, looks as if he’s getting younger every week. He has six sacks, his most since since 2002.
– Have no idea what Shell was thinking when he challenged a play in which Fabian Washington appeared to have intercepted a Plummer pass only to have it ruled incomplete on a third-and-7 play from the Oakland 45.
The Broncos were punting anyway. The Raiders weren’t getting great field position even if the call was reversed. Officials upheld the call, and the Raiders lost their last time out with 4:10 to play.
– P Shane Lechler placed a pair of punts at the Denver 2-yard line and had a third which barely touched the goal line for a touchback.
– Ever heard of the “hot back'’ theory?'’ Zack Crockett was the ony runner to get anything done, rushing for 37 yards on five carries in the first half, and he carried only twice in the second half for 3 yards.
LaMont Jordan had 12 yards on 10 carries. Justin Fargas lost 6 yards on 8 tries. That’s 6 yards net yards on 18 carries from your feature backs.
– You wonder why the Raiders didn’t close the game out in the shotgun they’ve been using the last two weeks. Perhaps it was because Adam Treu was in the game after Jake Grove injured an elbow, and Grove has been making those short snaps. Treu is Oakland’s long-snapper.
Whatever the reason, a Treu-Walter exchange wound up on the ground and was lost.
– Somebody give the CBS broadcast team a clue. There was 9:49 left in the first half by the time play-by-play man Ian Eagle noticed Adam Meadows was starting at right tackle in place of George Foster. If Meadows hadn’t been called for a false start on a third-and-6 play, they might have never known.
It’s not all Eagle’s fault. Someone is supposed to be talking in his earpiece.
http://www.ibabuzz.com/raidersblog/