CB DE OG pick 13 pick one or more

Pick one or more

  • Jared Verse EDGE Florida State

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Laiatu Latu EDGE UCLA

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    12

alteredst8

Misery Loves Company
Joined
Apr 23, 2007
Messages
28,968
Reaction score
36,998
I already know where this will go but, I still need to see it through. Same deal Penix and Nix available at 13 and these guys are available to us.
 
Same deal Penix and Nix available at 13
Awkward The Simpsons GIF
 
I don’t get the premise.

Two players I’d actually draft are available but I’m not allowed to draft them?
 
I don’t get the premise.

Two players I’d actually draft are available but I’m not allowed to draft them?
I’m just seeing who people value specifically over the QB that may be available.

I forgot to add the none option fixed
 
I’d take MHJ and probably Alt over the 5th QB.

That’s about it.
 
I’d take Nix without hesitation, but again I know I am way higher on him than anyone else and for me I just pretend JJ is here…
 
I wouldn’t take any of that list over Penix.
I really thought about a DE.. I really like Latu but, in the end back to back DE drafts when we have Max as well a what’s his face coming on with AP. Just seems like an overkill.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 007
My answer is always QB but I’m guessing if none are available there’s a good chance that a WR that is disproportionately better than the field will be. In that case, I’ll take the WR. Drafting the really good player that drops is how the Cowboys got good.
 
I really thought about a DE.. I really like Latu but, in the end back to back DE drafts when we have Max as well a what’s his face coming on with AP. Just seems like an overkill.

I would be stoked with Latu or Terrion most years.
 
My answer is always QB but I’m guessing if none are available there’s a good chance that a WR that is disproportionately better than the field will be. In that case, I’ll take the WR. Drafting the really good player that drops is how the Cowboys got good.
Yeah, the answer to any of these polls is really one dimensional for me.

Are any of the 6 top QBs available? I'm taking one of those.

Are all 6 gone? Then I'm looking for the blue chip guy. Harrison, Nabers, Odunze
 
Yeah, the answer to any of these polls is really one dimensional for me.

Are any of the 6 top QBs available? I'm taking one of those.

Are all 6 gone? Then I'm looking for the blue chip guy. Harrison, Nabers, Odunze
I figured most would feel that way. I can basically boil it down to BR.Net doesn’t care about anything else but getting a QB. A blue chip WR seems to be a viable option ahead of a QB such as Nix and Penix though. We also have two CB’s ahead of taking a CB as well so.
 
I figured most would feel that way. I can basically boil it down to BR.Net doesn’t care about anything else but getting a QB. A blue chip WR seems to be a viable option ahead of a QB such as Nix and Penix though. We also have two CB’s ahead of taking a CB as well so.

QB or BPA, which I expect to be a WR given the depth and the premise that the QBs are unavailable.

If all the QBs and WRs are gone, I really don't care. We need a CB as much as anything so I'm not going to cry about drafting Arnold. Or an OT, or DL, etc.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 007
QB or BPA, which I expect to be a WR given the depth and the premise that the QBs are unavailable.

If all the QBs and WRs are gone, I really don't care. We need a CB as much as anything so I'm not going to cry about drafting Arnold. Or an OT, or DL, etc.
this
 
Arnold’s 6.65 3-cone time removed my draft block. So many players did not run the 3-cone or short shuttle at the combine, why was that this year?
 
If you have a second round grade on a guy, you don't take him at 13. Period.

Ignoring talent for need is how bad teams stay bad. Someone pointed out the year we took Mack the Rams to Aaron Donald. They already had Michael Brockers and another studly DT.

Thing is, the Raiders have actual holes at T and CB and G. I don't take a G at 13.

Here's what I'd like to see: top four QBs are gone, but other teams desperate for a QB are calling. Trade down, acquire picks. Trade back up to grab a player you see is falling, or build a roster in a draft that is deep.
 
If you have a second round grade on a guy, you don't take him at 13. Period.

Ignoring talent for need is how bad teams stay bad. Someone pointed out the year we took Mack the Rams to Aaron Donald. They already had Michael Brockers and another studly DT.

Thing is, the Raiders have actual holes at T and CB and G. I don't take a G at 13.

Here's what I'd like to see: top four QBs are gone, but other teams desperate for a QB are calling. Trade down, acquire picks. Trade back up to grab a player you see is falling, or build a roster in a draft that is deep.
Telescope does not do that. He normally picks BPA or a WR bust in the 1st round. Lol
 
Telescope does not do that. He normally picks BPA or a WR bust in the 1st round. Lol

He has not yet. Telescope or Spanos family. We'll see. From what we've heard from Telescope and AP, there will be quite a few in the room, certainly including Champ, Graham, Getsy, and Mark Davis.

A later first and a third or fourth would be better by far than taking a QB with a second round grade. And it's possible the QB still available at 13 would be less of a reach in the mid-late twenties.
 
Back
Top