Nobodyinparticular
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 6, 2013
- Messages
- 19,825
- Reaction score
- 33,478
If he doesn’t play he doesn’t get paid. It would make sense for him to play hard for a new contract with another team. It’s probably going to be his last one so he needs to make it count.
I just don’t see it. If he was our number one target I could see it. That distinction obviously goes to Bowers.I wonder if they are still trying to work something out. While he's outplayed his contract, he's not exactly playing for chump change this year.
I just don’t see it. If he was our number one target I could see it. That distinction obviously goes to Bowers.
It would appear that we’re following in the footsteps of the Pats and Chiefs. The leading receiver is an all world tight end and the WRs are a bunch of dudes. When was the last time the Pats had a notable receiver while Gronk was there? I know that the Chiefs had Hill, but they were just as successful without him.IDK, He had really good chemistry with Geno in pre-season. Brock is going to get a lot of attention this season.
Steve Smith Sr called him a TE… so we drafted TE’s in the last 3 drafts. 2nd round, 1st round and then 2nd round ! Nice !!! @Crow is in loveAre we still counting Bech as a WR?
Only need two to play 12. Only need to carry three when we can elevate a fourth from the PS as needed. No one's going to put in a waiver claim for the TEs we waived. Easy roster decision.
Not enough to act like we lost someone who was going to contribute this year.I don't really care about any of these dudes that got cut.
He's gotta play at some point or he won't be a FA.
If he doesn’t play he doesn’t get paid. It would make sense for him to play hard for a new contract with another team. It’s probably going to be his last one so he needs to make it count.
It would appear that we’re following in the footsteps of the Pats and Chiefs. The leading receiver is an all world tight end and the WRs are a bunch of dudes. When was the last time the Pats had a notable receiver while Gronk was there? I know that the Chiefs had Hill, but they were just as successful without him.
25 and has been cut three times already.Justin Shorter is
He's a WR again, so he doesn't count anyway.Justin Shorter is a likely loss. Guy has size and speed and has some good tape from last year running free while O'Connell forced everything to Bowers of Meyers.
The old mystery hamstring injury that miraculously heals right after the Raiders give him an extension.