2008 Salary Cap Numbers

RZ

Football Junkie
Joined
Mar 26, 2006
Messages
2,038
Reaction score
95
2008 Salary Cap Numbers

1. Tennessee (39 Players) $40.85 million
2. San Diego (44 Players) $33.03 million
3. Jacksonville (43 Players) $32.69 million
4. Buffalo (49 Players) $32.05 million
5. New Orleans (39 Players) $31.69 million
6. Cincinnati (48 Players) $31.45 million
7. San Francisco (48 Players) $30.91 million
8. Cleveland (42 Players) $30.31 million
9. Arizona (34 Players) $30.27 million
10.N.Y. Jets (45 Players) $27.72 million
11.Oakland (40 Players) $25.98 million
12.Tampa Bay (48 Players) $25.90 million
13.Miami (48 Players) $25.56 million
14.N.Y. Giants (49 Players) $24.47 million
15.Detroit (42 Players) $23.50 million
16.Houston (43 Players) $22.91 million
17.Dallas (40 Players) $20.61 million
18.Kansas City (44 Players) $20.27 million
19.Chicago (52 Players) $19.80 million
20.Pittsburgh (43 Players) $18.61 million
21.Green Bay (48 Players) $18.37 million
22.Philadelphia (49 Players) $17.17 million
23.Denver (49 Players) $16.77 million
24.Minnesota (49 Players) $14.88 million
25.New England (41 Players) $10.93 million
26.St. Louis (45 Players) $9.61 million
27.Seattle (44 Players) $9.55 million
28.Indianapolis (48 Players) $8.49 million
29.Carolina (35 Players) $6.05 million
30.Atlanta (52 Players) $5.79 million*
31.Baltimore (42 Players) $5.00 million
32.Washington (45 Players) -$20.72 million

* Not including unspecified potential rebate from contested return of Michael Vick's pro-rated signing bonus.
 
For those that don't understand the chart..

Take for example the Raiders line.. 11.Oakland (40 Players) $25.98 million

That means as of today, they have 40 Players with signed 2008 contracts and the team is $25.98 million BELOW the projected 08 Salary Cap.
 
Thanks Z.

We have some money to play with. Hopefully we don't piss it away.
 
Any idea if that includes Porter's salary, considering it's a voidable year?
 
Last edited:
Any idea if that includes Porter salary, considering it's a voidable year?

oh, I am sure it does since he is on contract for 08 and has not voided it as of today.

The 25 Mill LOOKs decent, but when you realize that it only accounts for 40 signed players, not so great... still good tho and better than past years.
 
A helluva lot better than past years. We used to never be in the top half of available cap space going into a season. Even if cap figures are iffy by nature, I like where we are at this point.

When Porter voids, that alone should cover the cost of re-upping with Huggy, if he chooses to stay and doesn't get an inflated sense of self worth. Franchising #21, on the other hand, is going to take a huge bite out of that figure. Getting him locked down longterm has to be our first priority.

I forget the exact number, but we'll get a nice lil bit of extra room when we ship Jordan's monkey ass out of town.

Now, do we cut Sapp loose as well, or keep him around in the hopes that Dorsey/Ellis can learn a few things from him?
 
Flush the Turd, Keep Sapp to groom Dorsey ;) Make sure TK is healthy and happy, get Burgess and Scrable locked... oh and yes, ship jordan out and resign Huggy Jr (Never thought I would hear you say that lol)
 
I still feel dirty saying it. :D But, I have to give the guy his due. Since last year, he's been running his skinny legged ass off. Hat goes off to him. Plus, any questions about how his game fits this blocking scheme appear to have been answered.

Burgess...I'm falling a little out of love with him. Dude has lost a lot of weight and he's just plain bad in run defense. If he'd accept a KGB-type role, I could see paying him like a starter. I just don't like the way his side of the field gets sealed off consistently on running downs. I still think he'd make a good SAM at this point, even though I'll get butchered for making such a suggestion. ;)

Forgot about TK. Coming off a season ender, so he should be cheap. Not a starting caliber tackle, but a good run defending DE. Maybe rotating him with Burgy is something to consider.

Turd makes me sick. Fuckin' motherfucker.
 
I'm pretty sure Jordan has a salary next season of 3-5 mill, and Rhodes' is around 3 mill too...


32.Washington (45 Players) -$20.72 million

Wow, lil' Danny Snyder sure has learned alot in his time in the League hasn't he? :pound:
 
This thread is useless without pie charts and laser pointers...

It's nice that we have cap space but the same issues still dog us...

We have the 11th most cap space but we're probably in 33rd place as far as liquid cash, availability just ahead of The House of Pancakes flag football team...

We're still not proactive as far as negotiating contracts... We could have given Nnamdi an extension already instead of going down the same road already traveled with Charles Woodson...

The upside is that Kiffin seems like the kind of guy that is going to have a well thought out plan in place... If Al can come up with the loot and Kiffin can use those recruiting abilities he's known for, we're in a postion to solve some problem areas...
 
No way I want Sapp back at 6 mill per. Fugg that. Between Sims, Sapp, Jordan, Porter, Rhodes we can free up a bunch of cap dollars but unfortunately so can alot of other teams. I think this has got to be the offseason that Al spends some loot, wisely I might add.
 
Buffalo is looking good.

A strong young QB, WR, RB and defense (Guys like Whitner, Poz, Simpson, McCargo etc) and 49 PLAYERS under contract with 35 million in cap space?

Nicely done, Marv Levy.

Unorthadox drafting, but he is getting the right players.
 
No way I want Sapp back at 6 mill per. Fugg that. Between Sims, Sapp, Jordan, Porter, Rhodes we can free up a bunch of cap dollars but unfortunately so can alot of other teams. I think this has got to be the offseason that Al spends some loot, wisely I might add.
If Al has any hope of winning two more Super Bowls before he "retires" (:p) he better not fugg this up THIS year.

Time is running short and the Dark Lord probably knows it at some level.
 
I'd probably rather retain Sims over any player on that list above. Granted, he's not what I'd consider my ideal guy at LT, but until proven otherwise, we have no one else better on the roster. McQuistan is locking himself in at RT, Gallery is now a LG (period) and Mario Henderson can't even get himself activated.

Sapp, Jordan & Rhodes can walk. Thanks to Sapp for the solid years, but it's time IMO.

I'm ambivalent on Jerry Porter. We are already thin at WR to begin with and seeing him walk just creates one more hole.
 
2. San Diego (44 Players) $33.03 million
3. Jacksonville (43 Players) $32.69 million
17.Dallas (40 Players) $20.61 million
20.Pittsburgh (43 Players) $18.61 million
21.Green Bay (48 Players) $18.37 million
25.New England (41 Players) $10.93 million
28.Indianapolis (48 Players) $8.49 million

Well if the top 6 or 7 teams in the league have freakin that much cap space................ the salary cap is officially irrelevant.

I guess the real question is which of those 6 will be the next dynasty alongside the Pats. If San Diego would have kept Shottenheimer, my money would have been on them. I'm not sold on Wade Phillips, but the Cowboys are in a heck of a position over there. I still like the Colts and Steelers as next in line.




32.Washington (45 Players) -$20.72 million

It's just flat out embarrassing that somebody this stooopid made that much money in the Internet boom.
 
Well if the top 6 or 7 teams in the league have freakin that much cap space................ the salary cap is officially irrelevant.

I guess the real question is which of those 6 will be the next dynasty alongside the Pats. If San Diego would have kept Shottenheimer, my money would have been on them. I'm not sold on Wade Phillips, but the Cowboys are in a heck of a position over there. I still like the Colts and Steelers as next in line.






It's just flat out embarrassing that somebody this stooopid made that much money in the Internet boom.

Oakland Raiders once JaMarcus establishes himself as one of the games best.
 
Normally I don't post negative articles, but let the truth set you free!!!!
I think he may be off base with some of this but with Sands they are right on.....



The rest of the All (Raiders)-Bust Team
Posted by: Anthony Carroll on December 13, 2007 12:33 AM


At least the Oakland Raiders made some headlines this week. Aside, of course, from rumors that the team's rookie head coach, Lane Kiffin, was considering downgrading his job by taking a position with Arkansas.

On Wednesday, SI.com released its "All-Bust Team." As laid out on the website's NFL page, it detailed the league's "ultimate underachievers of the 2007 season ... the list of guys who didn't match their team's expectations."

The poster boy for the story was the self-proclaimed "QB Killa" himself, Raiders defensive tackle Warren Sapp.

"How can someone so big come up so small?" writer Don Banks questioned. "We know he's just a week away from his 35th birthday, but after his stellar comeback season of 2006 (10 sacks), Sapp had once again raised the bar of expectation. Maybe last year was the aberration and this year is the norm."

He's right. Sapp has just 42 tackles and a pair of sacks this season, and he is the key (maybe not so key) tackle on a defense that ranks 31st in stopping the run.

Surprisingly, though, Sapp was the only Raider on the list. There weren't even any "dishonorable mentions" to note.

Here are the players Banks forgot to include, conveniently all members of the Silver and Black.

Derrick Burgess: In the previous two seasons leading up to 2007, the 29-year-old defensive end registered a league-leading 27 sacks. At this pace, he'll be lucky to finish off the year with seven. To the veteran's credit, he did miss two games earlier this season with an Achilles' injury. However, nobody could have expected his backup, Chris Clemons, to have more sacks with just three games remaining.

Daunte Culpepper: Since a five-touchdown performance against the Miami Dolphins (back when they weren't that bad), the "healthy" Culpepper who signed with Oakland has done nothing but suffer injuries and show a decrease in production. Outside of that Week 4 win against his old team, Culpepper has thrown just three touchdowns in seven appearances, not to mention that he's tossed five picks and been sacked 21 times.

Chris Carr: It's hard to pick on a guy who is willing to run into a pack of 11 men all bigger than himself, but the lack of vision from the 180-pound Carr this season is a near-impossible reality to ignore. "The Raiders' all-time leading return man," as every NFL broadcaster loves to proclaim, averages just 21.0 yards per rep this year with a long of only 38. As a team, the Raiders rank 30th in the category and are one of just five teams without a runback over 40 yards.

Rob Ryan: Ryan looks rugged, motivational and fiery, but his inability to adjust may lead to him being fired. The fourth-year D-coordinator, whose birthday happens to be today, has assembled a scheme that is consistently helpless against the run. The Raider 'D' allows over 150 yards on the ground each game and has let nine different rushers surpass the 100-yard bar in 13 games. Somebody has to be blamed, and the rough-looking Ryan is the easiest.

Terdell Sands: There's only so many ways to stress how awful the Raiders' run defense is. To put things into perspective, Terdell Sands, a 6-foot-7, 335-pound tackle, who was awarded a four-year, $17 million contract last February, has just 12 more tackles this season than wide receiver Jerry Porter. Porter doesn't even play special teams.

Anthony Carroll, a senior writer for RealFootball365.com, can be contacted at acarroll@realfootball365.com
 
Derrick Burgess: In the previous two seasons leading up to 2007, the 29-year-old defensive end registered a league-leading 27 sacks. At this pace, he'll be lucky to finish off the year with seven. To the veteran's credit, he did miss two games earlier this season with an Achilles' injury. However, nobody could have expected his backup, Chris Clemons, to have more sacks with just three games remaining.

Jesus the guy has some injury's and gets doubled because we only rush 4 people? Who else would the opposing O-Line worry about? Burgess is still a very good player and we shouldnt sell him out so fast.
 
He's also about 220 pounds. He's not going to get any production at that weight, IMO.
 
Back
Top