Discussion in 'Raiders War Room' started by NIPS, Jan 5, 2016.
He's a developmental prospect.
A piece of clay. Plenty of worse prospects have gone in the top 100 each year.
The top 10 talk was always off base, but he is by no means a terrible player.
As I get a little better at scouring through tweets and prospect videos and draft info I find the truth is always somewhere in the middle.
Not as bad as the haters say and not as good as the homers say.
Is Oakman a Margus Hunt part 2?
or does he end up more like C.Campell/M.Johnson/C.Dunlap?
For some reason, Oakman has brought to mind Charlie Philyaw. Want no part of that.
I see this type of argument a lot, and it's never once been compelling.
Why do people say things like this?
McFadden thinks this guy has skinny calves.
You know what I meant dammit!
Some teams will go for a polished guy with limited upside in the 3rd and other teams will swing for the fences with a physical freak pass rusher.
This year will be no different.
Better them than us.
After watching Carr throw that TD ball to Hilton in the Pro Bowl, I said to self, we need one of those take the top off WRs. A guy Carr can't overthrow.
Yes we do.
Will Fuller from Notre Dame.
Doctson is 30 years old. Fuck that guy.
Will Fuller is the premium deep threat.
Sterling Shepard can take the top off the defense and can return punts.
Him and Coleman gone before our 2nd rounder IMO.
Yes I like. Deep threat and big play maker.
Yes. Fuller is the premium deep threat.
After Smith from Ohio State ("premium deep threat") flopped for the Jets (before he got injured), I'm skeptical of that title.