I'm arguing because you're doing your usual moving of the goal posts again and threw out an inaccuracy about Thomas along with your "well that's different" like you're a die hard Twitter user.
Your exact words were: "One of the most special receivers of the last 20 years was on a 0-16 team. I wish he would go that route at the expense of their shitty lines and defense. I just know he's smarter than doing that with such a high pick unfortunately."
Implying that you think he should draft OL or D instead of a WR citing a team that went 0-16 with a great WR. I countered with another team with a fairly comparable LT with the same result. Then you went on about this that and the other thing. Who cares when they went 0-16? If anything it's worse that a team with an established stalwart of that caliber went 0-16 (or 1-15) than early in the career. What difference does it make at all when the original thing was "I hope he drafts a WR instead of other stuff because they went 0-16 one year."
Your analogy was bad. You could just say you don't think WRs are as important - that's fine. Going WR over LT didn't really seem to hold the Bengals back, fwiw.