OT: Super Bowl thoughts

[Jack's sore libido]

Originally Posted by Raider Bill

Sticking that ball out constituted another move.

Congratulations on your ability to regurgitate Mike Pereira's bullshit. But that's not what the rule says. It doesn't make an exception for making "another move" while going to the ground. It only says you have to maintain possession even after going to the ground.

Also, if sticking the ball forward constituted "another move," we'd have a lot fewer incomplete passes in this league. I see guys every week catch balls, take 2 steps and have the ball poked out -- incomplete. If turning up field and running 2 steps doesn't constitute "another move," then sticking the ball forward sure as shit doesn't.

[Raider Bill]

Advancing the ball to the end zone is different, All you have to do is break the plane. How many times to RB's stretch out, cross the plane, then lose the ball? It's never a fumble.

Murphy never controlled the ball.

You're just one of those fags that reads a conspiracy into everything.

[Jack's sore libido]

Originally Posted by Raider Bill

Advancing the ball to the end zone is different, All you have to do is break the plane. How many times to RB's stretch out, cross the plane, then lose the ball? It's never a fumble.

Not the same, because the RB has already established possession, but for a receiver, by rule, he can't establish possession until he has has maintained possession throughout the act of going to the ground.

Originally Posted by Raider Bill

You're just one of those fags that reads a conspiracy into everything.

You're really showing your charisma, uniqueness, nerve and talent.