View Full Version : NFL RB Rankings...
Armyr8rfan
07-01-2010, 12:36 PM
http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/news;_ylt=Ap.WuF9kV4lIhglpHv0.jNLsYNAF?slug=jc-rbrankings053110
Looks about right to me. Don't agree with Denver being so high. If Bush is fed the ball 20 times a game, we could be right back in the top five in rushing.
Armyr8rfan
07-01-2010, 12:39 PM
http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/news;_ylt=AokjMmCf4QXU9xbSQNPYisTsYNAF?slug=jc-qbrankings051810
So not to make too many threads....heres the QB Rankings....I think a notch or two higher would be more accurate....Jason Cole HATES the Raiders...
Armyr8rfan
07-01-2010, 12:44 PM
http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/news;_ylt=AvlyAyjRyf3MLaK531A9U1zsYNAF?slug=jc-directsnap050710
WR Rankings...Not very informative, but what was said was spot on. Until they prove otherwise, (which I think will happen this year), this is one of the worst groups in the league. Potential wise though, top five. We will see.
Sleet
07-01-2010, 02:56 PM
http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/news;_ylt=AokjMmCf4QXU9xbSQNPYisTsYNAF?slug=jc-qbrankings051810
So not to make too many threads....heres the QB Rankings....I think a notch or two higher would be more accurate....Jason Cole HATES the Raiders...
Jason Campbel > David G. and Alex S., please.
Sleet
07-01-2010, 03:01 PM
http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/news;_ylt=AvlyAyjRyf3MLaK531A9U1zsYNAF?slug=jc-directsnap050710
WR Rankings...Not very informative, but what was said was spot on. Until they prove otherwise, (which I think will happen this year), this is one of the worst groups in the league. Potential wise though, top five. We will see.
That's the problem with all of these rankings. They are stuck looking backwards.
We know where Oak's WRs finished as a unit last year. How is repeating that informative, at all?
If you think Chaz is good, and this year he's returning healthy, say so. If you think Murphy's special, say so, and predict better things this year, when catching passes from a real NFL QB. If you think DHB is going to surprise, say so. And if you say so, let it reflect in the ranking.
But for our OL, I would move this unit up 10 spots.
Armyr8rfan
07-01-2010, 07:51 PM
Jason Campbel > David G. and Alex S., please.
Agreed. And he's still improving. And now he's motivated.
Madturk
07-02-2010, 03:37 PM
I honestly feel Campbell can be a top tier qb if he gets in the right system. He seems to have all the right tools. Really stoked that he'll be working under Hue Jackson. This signing may come to be one of our bigger offseason acquisitions.
Armyr8rfan
07-02-2010, 06:21 PM
I honestly feel Campbell can be a top tier qb if he gets in the right system. He seems to have all the right tools. Really stoked that he'll be working under Hue Jackson. This signing may come to be one of our bigger offseason acquisitions.
I agree 100%. He's still improving, is in a system that fits his strenghts to a T. And will be instantly loved because of what we've had. And he's gonna have a chip on his shoulder because he was given up on in Washington. Eerily similar situation to when we got Gannon. Just need the youngsters on O to step up so he's not forced to do too much....
RaiderJF
07-02-2010, 09:19 PM
I agree 100%. He's still improving, is in a system that fits his strenghts to a T. And will be instantly loved because of what we've had. And he's gonna have a chip on his shoulder because he was given up on in Washington. Eerily similar situation to when we got Gannon. Just need the youngsters on O to step up so he's not forced to do too much....
Unless the OL improves dramatically, Campbell will not look good.
Sleet
07-03-2010, 01:54 AM
Unless the OL improves dramatically, Campbell will not look good.
Well, not sure what you mean by good, but Campbell has played behind some poor OL in Washington, so I expect him to look like he played last year, if not better, because the O and WRs are better suited to his skills (IMO).
vBulletin® v3.8.6, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.